Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 1501–1510
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on prong three as unnecessary to the ultimate decision given the failure on prong one.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on prong three as unnecessary to the ultimate decision given the failure on prong one.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_01_B5203; source_row=42936 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director across all dimensions: book sales figures lacked comparative context; the proposed acquisition was unsigned and its significance never established even when specifically asked in the RFE; customer letters showed useful software but not national/international acclaim; appellate arguments were too general and non-specific; METRC vendor status lacked objective documentation of significance; and the…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director across all dimensions: book sales figures lacked comparative context; the proposed acquisition was unsigned and its significance never established even when specifically asked in the RFE; customer letters showed useful software but not national/international acclaim; appellate arguments were too general and non-specific; METRC vendor status lacked objective documentation of significance; and the Petitioner's claim that the Director focused on singularly extraordinary achievements rather than cumulative impact was an unsupported broad assertion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_01_B2203; source_row=42932 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
In its prior appellate decision, AAO concluded the Petitioner had submitted evidence of a leading role with an organization having a distinguished reputation; this remains the only criterion credited.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
In its prior appellate decision, AAO concluded the Petitioner had submitted evidence of a leading role with an organization having a distinguished reputation; this remains the only criterion credited.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_02_B2203; source_row=42944 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner waived this criterion on appeal. On motion, his evidence consisted of a translated webpage introducing a 2014 conference speech, but no transcript was provided and the speech was not shown to have been published in any professional or major medium or to involve media and communications.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner waived this criterion on appeal. On motion, his evidence consisted of a translated webpage introducing a 2014 conference speech, but no transcript was provided and the speech was not shown to have been published in any professional or major medium or to involve media and communications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_02_B2203; source_row=42942 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO acknowledged the Petitioner's article on a possible acquisition was an original creation but found no evidence later articles cited it or that the work remarkably impacted the field. Other evidence either failed translation requirements or did not show the Petitioner's role in promotional events influenced the field of media and communications.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged the Petitioner's article on a possible acquisition was an original creation but found no evidence later articles cited it or that the work remarkably impacted the field. Other evidence either failed translation requirements or did not show the Petitioner's role in promotional events influenced the field of media and communications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-02-03_02_B2203; source_row=42941 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c