Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 15131–15140

NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

authorized signatory on petition and labor certification

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the appellate record, including the church constitution and CEO statement, established the signatory's authority to act for the church during the CEO's absence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the appellate record, including the church constitution and CEO statement, established the signatory's authority to act for the church during the CEO's absence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-31_01_B5203; source_row=23421
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

willful misrepresentation of material fact involving labor certification

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found no willful misrepresentation: the signatory was in fact authorized, and there is no bar on an authorized signatory having a prior relationship with the petitioner — indeed, such a relationship is required.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found no willful misrepresentation: the signatory was in fact authorized, and there is no bar on an authorized signatory having a prior relationship with the petitioner — indeed, such a relationship is required.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-31_01_B5203; source_row=23422
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Job performed at stated location on labor certification

What the decision said

AAO noted that four employees were present at the address on the day of the site visit and the Petitioner appeared to be operating at least in a limited capacity, so the Director's analysis was insufficient; the issue is remanded.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted that four employees were present at the address on the day of the site visit and the Petitioner appeared to be operating at least in a limited capacity, so the Director's analysis was insufficient; the issue is remanded.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-31_02_B5203; source_row=23424
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Intent to employ beneficiary in full-time, permanent position

What the decision said

The Director did not sufficiently analyze how current factors adversely affect the Petitioner's prospective intent to employ the Beneficiary full-time and permanently, so the matter is remanded for further analysis.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Director did not sufficiently analyze how current factors adversely affect the Petitioner's prospective intent to employ the Beneficiary full-time and permanently, so the matter is remanded for further analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-31_02_B5203; source_row=23425
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but found the Petitioner failed to show national importance. Her book, seminars, grant project (purchasing 19 tablets for her school), and mentorship of teacher interns all lacked demonstrated broader impact on STEM or special education at a national level. Even considering the post-filing evidence, the potential prospective impact did not reach national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but found the Petitioner failed to show national importance. Her book, seminars, grant project (purchasing 19 tablets for her school), and mentorship of teacher interns all lacked demonstrated broader impact on STEM or special education at a national level. Even considering the post-filing evidence, the potential prospective impact did not reach national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-28_01_B5203; source_row=23418
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

Why AAO was not persuaded

Despite a documented track record and evidence of a national STEM and special education teacher shortage, the Petitioner did not show her work impacted the field on a broader level. Her economic benefit claim was unsupported. Her impracticality argument was based on personal reasons unrelated to her qualifications or endeavor, which is the relevant standard under Dhanasar.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
Despite a documented track record and evidence of a national STEM and special education teacher shortage, the Petitioner did not show her work impacted the field on a broader level. Her economic benefit claim was unsupported. Her impracticality argument was based on personal reasons unrelated to her qualifications or endeavor, which is the relevant standard under Dhanasar.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-28_01_B5203; source_row=23420
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why the evidence was persuasive

The Petitioner's academic records, letters of support, and awards including 'Teacher of the Year' demonstrate her qualifications and skill as an experienced teacher who is well-positioned to continue in her endeavor.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's academic records, letters of support, and awards including 'Teacher of the Year' demonstrate her qualifications and skill as an experienced teacher who is well-positioned to continue in her endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-28_01_B5203; source_row=23419
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Environment / Energy

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director's finding that the Petitioner has reviewed manuscripts for several journals, satisfying the judging criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director's finding that the Petitioner has reviewed manuscripts for several journals, satisfying the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-20_02_B2203; source_row=23414
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Environment / Energy

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the Petitioner has authored articles that have appeared in professional publications, satisfying this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner has authored articles that have appeared in professional publications, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-20_02_B2203; source_row=23416
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Environment / Energy

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Petitioner's 11 patents and their commercial adoption, first-reported discoveries (quinolone antibiotics in drinking water treatment plants), international conference presentations in multiple countries, science and technology awards, and strong publication and citation record collectively demonstrate she has risen to the very top of her field with sustained national and international acclaim.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's 11 patents and their commercial adoption, first-reported discoveries (quinolone antibiotics in drinking water treatment plants), international conference presentations in multiple countries, science and technology awards, and strong publication and citation record collectively demonstrate she has risen to the very top of her field with sustained national and international acclaim. AAO also rejected the Director's comparison of the Petitioner to her letter-writers as an inaccurate assessment given the longevity of those individuals' careers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-20_02_B2203; source_row=23417
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment