Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15161–15170
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the supporting letters and articles were largely prospective in nature, describing potential future impact rather than demonstrating that the Petitioner's work had already significantly impacted the field. The MRSA study had only seven citations and petitioner did not show that level was significant. Evidence of changes to pneumonia guidelines and treatment protocols was forward-looking rather than established.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the supporting letters and articles were largely prospective in nature, describing potential future impact rather than demonstrating that the Petitioner's work had already significantly impacted the field. The MRSA study had only seven citations and petitioner did not show that level was significant. Evidence of changes to pneumonia guidelines and treatment protocols was forward-looking rather than established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-10_01_B2203; source_row=23393 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria at Step 1, but noted the aggregate record would not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria at Step 1, but noted the aggregate record would not support a finding of the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-10_01_B2203; source_row=23395 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary meets educational requirements of labor certification
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO determined that the Beneficiary was awarded a master's degree in business administration from an accredited university before the petition's priority date, satisfying the single job requirement on the labor certification of a master's degree in business administration or marketing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO determined that the Beneficiary was awarded a master's degree in business administration from an accredited university before the petition's priority date, satisfying the single job requirement on the labor certification of a master's degree in business administration or marketing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-07_01_B5203; source_row=23390 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the ICAI is not a degree-granting institution and that even if its membership is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree for some purposes, it is not a 'foreign equivalent degree' as required by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the ICAI is not a degree-granting institution and that even if its membership is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree for some purposes, it is not a 'foreign equivalent degree' as required by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-06_01_B5203; source_row=23386 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
minimum educational requirement of labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed that the Beneficiary does not meet the labor certification's minimum educational requirement for the same reasons discussed under the advanced-degree-professional classification analysis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that the Beneficiary does not meet the labor certification's minimum educational requirement for the same reasons discussed under the advanced-degree-professional classification analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-06_01_B5203; source_row=23387 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the project-manager letters and bank statement wire transfer evidence sufficient to establish the disputed nine months of employment, satisfying the 60-month requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the project-manager letters and bank statement wire transfer evidence sufficient to establish the disputed nine months of employment, satisfying the 60-month requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-06_02_B5203; source_row=23389 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed the misrepresentation was willful and material, noting the signed perjury declaration, lack of explanation for the alleged error, and that the Beneficiary's sibling relationship with the owner combined with the small employee roster (six) likely would have prompted deeper DOL scrutiny under 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(l)(5) and Matter of Modular Container Systems factors.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the misrepresentation was willful and material, noting the signed perjury declaration, lack of explanation for the alleged error, and that the Beneficiary's sibling relationship with the owner combined with the small employee roster (six) likely would have prompted deeper DOL scrutiny under 20 C.F.R. § 656.17(l)(5) and Matter of Modular Container Systems factors.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-06_02_B5203; source_row=23388 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish the national importance of her proposed endeavor because she failed to explain whether she intends to implement her model beyond her own classroom or school district, and provided no supporting evidence of broader field-wide implications.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not establish the national importance of her proposed endeavor because she failed to explain whether she intends to implement her model beyond her own classroom or school district, and provided no supporting evidence of broader field-wide implications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-12-04_02_B5203; source_row=23383 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c