Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15191–15200
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherResearcher29 papers612 citations19 reviews
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that 19 manuscript reviews concentrated primarily in 2011, 29 published articles, 612 total citations (with a top of 89), four articles in highly ranked journals, and letters repeating statutory language were insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that 19 manuscript reviews concentrated primarily in 2011, 29 published articles, 612 total citations (with a top of 89), four articles in highly ranked journals, and letters repeating statutory language were insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field. The Petitioner failed to provide comparative evidence contextualizing his metrics against recognized leaders in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-27_03_B2203; source_row=23360 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the director's finding that original contributions were met, noting the director failed to identify which contributions were considered original or explain why they were of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the director's finding that original contributions were met, noting the director failed to identify which contributions were considered original or explain why they were of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-27_01_B2203; source_row=23340 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO acknowledged the substantial merit of teaching mathematics but found that the Petitioner's work as an individual middle school teacher did not have broader implications beyond his own students and school, and thus lacked national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged the substantial merit of teaching mathematics but found that the Petitioner's work as an individual middle school teacher did not have broader implications beyond his own students and school, and thus lacked national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-27_01_B5203; source_row=23344 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacked information about selection criteria and qualifications of judges; the federation regulations contradicted the petitioner's claim by basing eligibility on nationality, age, gender and affiliation rather than outstanding achievement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked information about selection criteria and qualifications of judges; the federation regulations contradicted the petitioner's claim by basing eligibility on nationality, age, gender and affiliation rather than outstanding achievement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-27_02_B2203; source_row=23349 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
Together with media coverage from CBC Sports and the Toronto Star, the AAO found the Petitioner had established that her medals are nationally recognized awards.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Together with media coverage from CBC Sports and the Toronto Star, the AAO found the Petitioner had established that her medals are nationally recognized awards.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-27_02_B2203; source_row=23348 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherResearcher29 papers612 citations19 reviews
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO noted that a prior AAO proceeding in this same case determined the Petitioner met the original contributions criterion, and relied on that finding here.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that a prior AAO proceeding in this same case determined the Petitioner met the original contributions criterion, and relied on that finding here.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-27_03_B2203; source_row=23358 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c