Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 15231–15240

EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

Newspaper clippings were incomplete and lacked required identifying information. Articles from Indo American News focused on events rather than the Beneficiary. IAN was not shown to qualify as major media, and the rediff.com article lacked evidence establishing the site as a qualifying publication.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Newspaper clippings were incomplete and lacked required identifying information. Articles from Indo American News focused on events rather than the Beneficiary. IAN was not shown to qualify as major media, and the rediff.com article lacked evidence establishing the site as a qualifying publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-19_03_B2203; source_row=23297
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

While the evidence showed the Beneficiary created original artistic work and enjoyed local success, it did not demonstrate that his contributions had a broader impact on or major significance in the field of choreography.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
While the evidence showed the Beneficiary created original artistic work and enjoyed local success, it did not demonstrate that his contributions had a broader impact on or major significance in the field of choreography.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-19_03_B2203; source_row=23299
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why AAO was not persuaded

The reference letters confirmed the Beneficiary acted as choreographer and trainer, not as a judge. The Petitioner did not challenge the Director's determination on appeal.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The reference letters confirmed the Beneficiary acted as choreographer and trainer, not as a judge. The Petitioner did not challenge the Director's determination on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-19_03_B2203; source_row=23298
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Commercial successNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Commercial success

commercial successes in the performing arts

Why AAO was not persuaded

The work as an actor did not appear to be in the Beneficiary's claimed field of dance and choreography, the Beneficiary's role was not shown to be significant enough to attribute the film's commercial success to him, and the Petitioner did not challenge the Director's decision on appeal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The work as an actor did not appear to be in the Beneficiary's claimed field of dance and choreography, the Beneficiary's role was not shown to be significant enough to attribute the film's commercial success to him, and the Petitioner did not challenge the Director's decision on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-19_03_B2203; source_row=23303
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner failed to submit certified translations, leaving the uncertified translations without probative value. Even considering them, the screenshots did not establish that the festival awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to submit certified translations, leaving the uncertified translations without probative value. Even considering them, the screenshots did not establish that the festival awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-19_05_B2203; source_row=23310
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The uncertified translations lacked probative value, one declaration did not identify the venue, registration certificates did not show display at artistic venues, and film copies alone did not demonstrate display at artistic exhibitions or showcases.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The uncertified translations lacked probative value, one declaration did not identify the venue, registration certificates did not show display at artistic venues, and film copies alone did not demonstrate display at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-19_05_B2203; source_row=23314
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner is seeking classification as a film director and producer rather than an actress. Regardless, limited acting appearances did not demonstrate a leading or critical role for the organizations, and she did not show how her roles contributed in a way of significant importance to the organizations' activities.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner is seeking classification as a film director and producer rather than an actress. Regardless, limited acting appearances did not demonstrate a leading or critical role for the organizations, and she did not show how her roles contributed in a way of significant importance to the organizations' activities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-19_05_B2203; source_row=23315
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

While the documentation showed the Petitioner conducted a workshop, she did not demonstrate how it significantly impacted or influenced the field in a major way, nor did she show that the overall field regards the workshop as of major significance.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
While the documentation showed the Petitioner conducted a workshop, she did not demonstrate how it significantly impacted or influenced the field in a major way, nor did she show that the overall field regards the workshop as of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-19_05_B2203; source_row=23313
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Uncertified translations failed to establish membership. Further, the association's constitution did not demonstrate that membership requirements are consistent with 'outstanding achievements' judged by recognized national or international experts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Uncertified translations failed to establish membership. Further, the association's constitution did not demonstrate that membership requirements are consistent with 'outstanding achievements' judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-19_05_B2203; source_row=23311
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The declaration showed only that the Petitioner 'composed the judging committee,' not that she actually judged films. The beauty contest certificate did not relate to the same or allied field of film producing and directing.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding. The declaration showed only that the Petitioner 'composed the judging committee,' not that she actually judged films. The beauty contest certificate did not relate to the same or allied field of film producing and directing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-19_05_B2203; source_row=23312
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment