Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
NIWlicense or certificationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
license or certification
License to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession
Why AAO was not persuaded
The licenses and certifications relate to the company, not personally to the Petitioner. The Korean patents are intellectual property rights, not licenses to practice a profession or professional certifications.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The licenses and certifications relate to the company, not personally to the Petitioner. The Korean patents are intellectual property rights, not licenses to practice a profession or professional certifications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-08_01_B5203; source_row=23262 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
Ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The career certificates did not indicate how the Petitioner divided time among various responsibilities or specify the amount of time devoted to full-time biomedical materials development.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The career certificates did not indicate how the Petitioner divided time among various responsibilities or specify the amount of time devoted to full-time biomedical materials development.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-08_01_B5203; source_row=23261 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Advanced degree or equivalent (5 years progressive experience)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The career certificates showed duties spanning sales, marketing, financial management, and R&D without specifying time devoted specifically to biomedical materials work. Self-serving documents like affidavits and credential evaluations could not substitute for proper employer letters, and inconsistencies among evaluators further undermined the record.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The career certificates showed duties spanning sales, marketing, financial management, and R&D without specifying time devoted specifically to biomedical materials work. Self-serving documents like affidavits and credential evaluations could not substitute for proper employer letters, and inconsistencies among evaluators further undermined the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-08_01_B5203; source_row=23259 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO noted the Petitioner referenced this criterion on appeal but chose to consider the related evidence in the final merits determination rather than at step 1.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted the Petitioner referenced this criterion on appeal but chose to consider the related evidence in the final merits determination rather than at step 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-08_01_B2203; source_row=23251 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI97 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the evidence showed positive contributions within the Petitioner's employers and limited recognition events, but no sustained national or international acclaim. Awards lacked media coverage, the scholarly article had only five citations, conference speaking was not shown to confer acclaim, and expert letters came from personally familiar colleagues rather than reflecting broader field recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the evidence showed positive contributions within the Petitioner's employers and limited recognition events, but no sustained national or international acclaim. Awards lacked media coverage, the scholarly article had only five citations, conference speaking was not shown to confer acclaim, and expert letters came from personally familiar colleagues rather than reflecting broader field recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-08_01_B2203; source_row=23258 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c