Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's stated reasons for denial or point to specific errors in the analysis of the remaining criteria, so AAO treated those findings as unchallenged.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's stated reasons for denial or point to specific errors in the analysis of the remaining criteria, so AAO treated those findings as unchallenged.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-05_02_B5203; source_row=23241 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
ten years of full-time experience in the occupation (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the employment verification letter's description of job duties and responsibilities was sufficient to document at least ten years of full-time experience as a communications and media executive, withdrawing the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the employment verification letter's description of job duties and responsibilities was sufficient to document at least ten years of full-time experience as a communications and media executive, withdrawing the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-05_01_B5203; source_row=23235 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner identified a wide variety of possible research topics but did not provide sufficient information or documentation to establish which specific research area he would pursue in the United States, nor did he identify specific RCS or AFCS research projects.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner identified a wide variety of possible research topics but did not provide sufficient information or documentation to establish which specific research area he would pursue in the United States, nor did he identify specific RCS or AFCS research projects. General evidence about the importance of defense and aerospace industries was insufficient to demonstrate the national importance of a specific intended research endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-01_01_B5203; source_row=23230 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding that citation counts alone—even favorable ones—do not establish major significance without showing the work was singled out as particularly important. The news releases showed potential future impact but not actual major significance, and the recommendation letters praised his work without demonstrating how it was of major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding that citation counts alone—even favorable ones—do not establish major significance without showing the work was singled out as particularly important. The news releases showed potential future impact but not actual major significance, and the recommendation letters praised his work without demonstrating how it was of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-01_01_B2203; source_row=23227 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, and consideration of the remaining prongs would serve no meaningful purpose.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, and consideration of the remaining prongs would serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-01_01_B5203; source_row=23231 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Electrical / Electronic Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, and consideration of the remaining prongs would serve no meaningful purpose.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, and consideration of the remaining prongs would serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-01_01_B5203; source_row=23232 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO formally reserved this issue because the petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold, but noted in advisory dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO formally reserved this issue because the petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold, but noted in advisory dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-11-01_01_B2203; source_row=23229 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c