Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15301–15310
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
Key documents including the 2007 tax return and comparative salary evidence are only partially translated, preventing accurate analysis. Comparative data provided is either insufficiently specific, overbroad, or of unclear methodology, and it is unclear whether the Petitioner's reported earnings and comparative figures measure the same income sources.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Key documents including the 2007 tax return and comparative salary evidence are only partially translated, preventing accurate analysis. Comparative data provided is either insufficiently specific, overbroad, or of unclear methodology, and it is unclear whether the Petitioner's reported earnings and comparative figures measure the same income sources.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-31_01_B2203; source_row=23216 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
Awards earned by the Petitioner's students do not count as awards received by her personally; the nomination does not constitute winning an award; and the certificates from the committee do not establish national or international recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Awards earned by the Petitioner's students do not count as awards received by her personally; the nomination does not constitute winning an award; and the certificates from the committee do not establish national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-31_01_B2203; source_row=23211 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the articles are clearly about the Petitioner, the evidence does not establish that either publication qualifies as major media; Wikipedia is accorded no evidentiary weight, and no comparative circulation data was submitted.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the articles are clearly about the Petitioner, the evidence does not establish that either publication qualifies as major media; Wikipedia is accorded no evidentiary weight, and no comparative circulation data was submitted.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-31_01_B2203; source_row=23213 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The article describing the Petitioner's teaching method does not show that her method is original or has been adopted by others; the certificates do not support the claim that she founded the competition, and founding a competition would not necessarily qualify as an original contribution of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The article describing the Petitioner's teaching method does not show that her method is original or has been adopted by others; the certificates do not support the claim that she founded the competition, and founding a competition would not necessarily qualify as an original contribution of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-31_01_B2203; source_row=23214 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The selection criteria for the presidium weigh experience and activity over outstanding achievement, and the evidence does not show that the selecting body is composed of nationally or internationally recognized experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The selection criteria for the presidium weigh experience and activity over outstanding achievement, and the evidence does not show that the selecting body is composed of nationally or internationally recognized experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-31_01_B2203; source_row=23212 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the Director's translation objection, finding the translations included all relevant portions. The evidence established both the Petitioner's leading role at the school and the school's distinguished reputation in the Russian dance sport community.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's translation objection, finding the translations included all relevant portions. The evidence established both the Petitioner's leading role at the school and the school's distinguished reputation in the Russian dance sport community.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-31_01_B2203; source_row=23215 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that citation metrics showed only above-average notice rather than top-of-field recognition; media coverage did not mention the Petitioner by name; journal prestige alone does not place authors at the top of their field; and editorial activity did not set the Petitioner apart as a top researcher.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that citation metrics showed only above-average notice rather than top-of-field recognition; media coverage did not mention the Petitioner by name; journal prestige alone does not place authors at the top of their field; and editorial activity did not set the Petitioner apart as a top researcher.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-31_03_B2203; source_row=23225 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that reference letters, citation evidence, and corroborating published articles collectively established that the Petitioner's work on Zika virus animal models and endophthalmitis had been used by other researchers, validated prior findings, and had significant impact on the field, satisfying the major significance standard.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that reference letters, citation evidence, and corroborating published articles collectively established that the Petitioner's work on Zika virus animal models and endophthalmitis had been used by other researchers, validated prior findings, and had significant impact on the field, satisfying the major significance standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-31_03_B2203; source_row=23223 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c