Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 15341–15350

NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer/labor certification

What the decision said

AAO declines to reach prong 3 because failure on prong 2 is dispositive of the waiver claim.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO declines to reach prong 3 because failure on prong 2 is dispositive of the waiver claim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-22_01_B5203; source_row=23182
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO concludes that the proposed clinical research investigating Tibetan herbs for MS treatment has both substantial merit and national importance based on the dissemination of results and broader implications for MS treatment, though supervisory/patient-processing duties alone would not meet national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO concludes that the proposed clinical research investigating Tibetan herbs for MS treatment has both substantial merit and national importance based on the dissemination of results and broader implications for MS treatment, though supervisory/patient-processing duties alone would not meet national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-22_01_B5203; source_row=23180
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Finance

Issue evaluated

other

labor certification expiration before petition filing

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO finds the labor certification appears to have expired because it was not filed with a petition within 180 days of its December 4, 2009 grant; the Petitioner asserted timely filing but did not document it.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO finds the labor certification appears to have expired because it was not filed with a petition within 180 days of its December 4, 2009 grant; the Petitioner asserted timely filing but did not document it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-19_01_B5203; source_row=23179
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that while the proposed endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner did not show his specific consulting role would have national importance; the broader economic effects of client projects were not attributable to his work, and his work would not impact the financial engineering field or U.S. economy more broadly.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the proposed endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner did not show his specific consulting role would have national importance; the broader economic effects of client projects were not attributable to his work, and his work would not impact the financial engineering field or U.S. economy more broadly.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B5203; source_row=23176
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO did not reach prong two because the failure on prong one was dispositive.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach prong two because the failure on prong one was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B5203; source_row=23177
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO did not reach prong three because the failure on prong one was dispositive.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach prong three because the failure on prong one was dispositive.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B5203; source_row=23178
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Materials SciencePostdoctoral Researcher

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the citation record, expert testimony, and judging activity together demonstrated sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the citation record, expert testimony, and judging activity together demonstrated sustained acclaim and top-of-field standing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B2203; source_row=23175
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Materials SciencePostdoctoral Researcher

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed the Petitioner has made original scientific contributions to stretchable electronics that are of major significance.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner has made original scientific contributions to stretchable electronics that are of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B2203; source_row=23173
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Materials SciencePostdoctoral Researcher

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed the Petitioner authored articles in professional publications such as Scientific Reports and Nano Letters.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner authored articles in professional publications such as Scientific Reports and Nano Letters.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B2203; source_row=23174
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Materials SciencePostdoctoral Researcher

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

participation as a judge of the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed the Petitioner edited articles for journals such as Nanoscale Research Letters and Nanotechnology.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the Petitioner edited articles for journals such as Nanoscale Research Letters and Nanotechnology.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-10-16_01_B2203; source_row=23172
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment