Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15391–15400
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's translation objection but still found the criterion unmet: only five of eleven cited articles pre-dated the filing, several lacked required author attribution, and the record did not sufficiently establish that Varzesh3, Gul, and Razmavar are professional or major media outlets.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's translation objection but still found the criterion unmet: only five of eleven cited articles pre-dated the filing, several lacked required author attribution, and the record did not sufficiently establish that Varzesh3, Gul, and Razmavar are professional or major media outlets.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-25_01_B2203; source_row=23121 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While AAO noted the Director incorrectly required current membership, AAO agreed the criterion was not met because the Petitioner did not show that membership on the national team requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts, and counsel's assertions are not evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While AAO noted the Director incorrectly required current membership, AAO agreed the criterion was not met because the Petitioner did not show that membership on the national team requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts, and counsel's assertions are not evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-25_01_B2203; source_row=23120 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed work as a critical care pediatrician, educator, and innovator in ICU patient safety and quality has substantial merit, and that his dissemination of innovations through conferences and journals establishes national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed work as a critical care pediatrician, educator, and innovator in ICU patient safety and quality has substantial merit, and that his dissemination of innovations through conferences and journals establishes national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-25_01_B5203; source_row=23123 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years of qualifying experience per labor certification and advanced degree professional requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the unresolved discrepancies raised doubt about whether the Beneficiary worked at the first employer at all. Even accepting the Beneficiary's own claim of employment through March 2006, that is less than five years. No evidence was submitted for the second employer despite multiple opportunities.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the unresolved discrepancies raised doubt about whether the Beneficiary worked at the first employer at all. Even accepting the Beneficiary's own claim of employment through March 2006, that is less than five years. No evidence was submitted for the second employer despite multiple opportunities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-25_02_B5203; source_row=23126 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
ability to pay proffered wage from priority date onward
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner was mistaken about the period covered by its 2013 tax return (it runs July 1, 2013–June 30, 2014, not July 2012–June 2013), leaving a coverage gap from the priority date to July 1, 2013. In addition, the complete failure to provide information about other I-140 beneficiaries' proffered wages meant the Petitioner could not establish its aggregate ability to pay.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner was mistaken about the period covered by its 2013 tax return (it runs July 1, 2013–June 30, 2014, not July 2012–June 2013), leaving a coverage gap from the priority date to July 1, 2013. In addition, the complete failure to provide information about other I-140 beneficiaries' proffered wages meant the Petitioner could not establish its aggregate ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-25_02_B5203; source_row=23127 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the reference letters did not show how the Petitioner's work generated interest among relevant parties, was implemented in NICU practice, or reflected a record of success. Five citations to one article, without comparative context, and review of two manuscripts were insufficient to show he is well positioned to advance the endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the reference letters did not show how the Petitioner's work generated interest among relevant parties, was implemented in NICU practice, or reflected a record of success. Five citations to one article, without comparative context, and review of two manuscripts were insufficient to show he is well positioned to advance the endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_02_B5203; source_row=23110 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's NCBI representative genome designation, citation statistics, and recommendation letters demonstrated originality but not major significance. The NCBI designation alone did not establish major significance, citation rates are more relevant to final merits than to this criterion, and the recommendation letters were largely conclusory without explaining how the contributions have already impacte…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's NCBI representative genome designation, citation statistics, and recommendation letters demonstrated originality but not major significance. The NCBI designation alone did not establish major significance, citation rates are more relevant to final merits than to this criterion, and the recommendation letters were largely conclusory without explaining how the contributions have already impacted the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_02_B2203; source_row=23107 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the articles demonstrate the substantial merit of computer programming generally, they do not establish the national importance of the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor. The relevant question is the specific endeavor the foreign national proposes to undertake, not the importance of the field generally.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
While the articles demonstrate the substantial merit of computer programming generally, they do not establish the national importance of the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor. The relevant question is the specific endeavor the foreign national proposes to undertake, not the importance of the field generally. A projected shortage of computer programmers alone does not render the work of an individual computer programmer nationally important.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_01_B5203; source_row=23102 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer and labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
Because the Petitioner failed to sufficiently define his proposed endeavor, AAO could not determine that waiving the job offer and labor certification requirement would benefit the United States. Additionally, a labor shortage alone does not demonstrate that waiving the labor certification would benefit the U.S., as the Department of Labor addresses such shortages through the labor certification process.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to sufficiently define his proposed endeavor, AAO could not determine that waiving the job offer and labor certification requirement would benefit the United States. Additionally, a labor shortage alone does not demonstrate that waiving the labor certification would benefit the U.S., as the Department of Labor addresses such shortages through the labor certification process.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_01_B5203; source_row=23104 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacked supporting documentation to corroborate the Petitioner's assertions about future research activities, specific research projects, or interest from named employers. The Petitioner's proposed endeavors were too vague to assess whether he was well positioned to advance them.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked supporting documentation to corroborate the Petitioner's assertions about future research activities, specific research projects, or interest from named employers. The Petitioner's proposed endeavors were too vague to assess whether he was well positioned to advance them.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_01_B5203; source_row=23103 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c