Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15401–15410
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
Most screenshots were about the band rather than the Petitioner individually, and the few items about the Petitioner personally lacked required title/date/author information or were not shown to be major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Most screenshots were about the band rather than the Petitioner individually, and the few items about the Petitioner personally lacked required title/date/author information or were not shown to be major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_03_B2203; source_row=23113 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The documentation showed the Petitioner received the awards but did not establish that the awards received national or international recognition for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The documentation showed the Petitioner received the awards but did not establish that the awards received national or international recognition for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_03_B2203; source_row=23112 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
YouTube and Coke Studio presence does not constitute box office receipts or record/video sales as required by the regulation, and the Petitioner did not show his presence resulted in a volume of sales reflecting commercial success compared to other musicians.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
YouTube and Coke Studio presence does not constitute box office receipts or record/video sales as required by the regulation, and the Petitioner did not show his presence resulted in a volume of sales reflecting commercial success compared to other musicians.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_03_B2203; source_row=23116 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Beneficiary's base salary as senior data scientist was below the median wage for comparable positions in the Washington area per multiple data sources, and his salary as senior manager in data science was below both the national average and the Level 4 wage for the area. Additional incentives such as stock and bonuses were not shown to be significantly high compared to peers.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Beneficiary's base salary as senior data scientist was below the median wage for comparable positions in the Washington area per multiple data sources, and his salary as senior manager in data science was below both the national average and the Level 4 wage for the area. Additional incentives such as stock and bonuses were not shown to be significantly high compared to peers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_01_B2203; source_row=23100 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding the media reports focused on prospective potential rather than established impact, conference presentations and publications alone are insufficient absent evidence of major significance, citation counts were not shown to be indicative of major impact, the patent lacked supporting evidence of field-wide significance, and recommendation letters were conclusory and forward-lookin…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding the media reports focused on prospective potential rather than established impact, conference presentations and publications alone are insufficient absent evidence of major significance, citation counts were not shown to be indicative of major impact, the patent lacked supporting evidence of field-wide significance, and recommendation letters were conclusory and forward-looking rather than demonstrating existing major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_01_B2203; source_row=23097 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded that the proposed clinical research focused on improving diagnostic and treatment protocols for infants had substantial merit and that the support letters and dissemination through medical journals and conferences demonstrated potential prospective impact sufficient for national importance. Clinical/teaching activities standing alone, however, were not nationally important.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that the proposed clinical research focused on improving diagnostic and treatment protocols for infants had substantial merit and that the support letters and dissemination through medical journals and conferences demonstrated potential prospective impact sufficient for national importance. Clinical/teaching activities standing alone, however, were not nationally important.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_02_B5203; source_row=23109 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold of three criteria, though AAO noted in passing that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold of three criteria, though AAO noted in passing that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_02_B2203; source_row=23108 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
sufficiency of the notice of intent to revoke as to ability to pay
Why AAO was not persuaded
The NOIR cited two grounds (no bona fide job offer and no valid employment relationship) but did not specify evidence undermining ability to pay, yet the Director revoked solely on ability-to-pay grounds; this rendered the NOIR procedurally insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The NOIR cited two grounds (no bona fide job offer and no valid employment relationship) but did not specify evidence undermining ability to pay, yet the Director revoked solely on ability-to-pay grounds; this rendered the NOIR procedurally insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-24_03_B5203; source_row=23118 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c