Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-2 advanced degree or exceptional ability qualification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner submitted only a non-official transcript screenprint, which does not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(A)'s requirement for an official academic record. The Petitioner also did not claim or document exceptional ability under the alternative EB-2 basis.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner submitted only a non-official transcript screenprint, which does not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(A)'s requirement for an official academic record. The Petitioner also did not claim or document exceptional ability under the alternative EB-2 basis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-18_01_B5203; source_row=23082 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's assertions about the national economic impact of her work were unsupported by evidence. The record lacked documentation about the employer organizations, their intent to hire U.S. workers, or the alleged national condition, and the Petitioner did not sufficiently explain how developing a personnel department would create significant economic impact.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's assertions about the national economic impact of her work were unsupported by evidence. The record lacked documentation about the employer organizations, their intent to hire U.S. workers, or the alleged national condition, and the Petitioner did not sufficiently explain how developing a personnel department would create significant economic impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-18_01_B5203; source_row=23083 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record contains evidence that the Petitioner received lesser nationally and internationally recognized awards for excellence at wrestling tournaments and championships; AAO agreed with the Director on this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contains evidence that the Petitioner received lesser nationally and internationally recognized awards for excellence at wrestling tournaments and championships; AAO agreed with the Director on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-18_01_B2203; source_row=23076 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidence threshold. In dicta, AAO noted the record does not support the required acclaim and recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidence threshold. In dicta, AAO noted the record does not support the required acclaim and recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-18_01_B2203; source_row=23081 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree or foreign equivalent qualification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirms the Director's finding; the Petitioner's foreign degree evaluated only as equivalent to a U.S. Associate's Degree, falling below the required baccalaureate threshold.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirms the Director's finding; the Petitioner's foreign degree evaluated only as equivalent to a U.S. Associate's Degree, falling below the required baccalaureate threshold.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-12_02_B5203; source_row=23070 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Although the AAO corrected the Director's net income figure (from $133,753 to $17,358), it still found the Petitioner unable to pay the proffered wage. Net income and net current assets were far below the proffered wage, the president's pledged foregone compensation was insufficient and not shown to be discretionary, bank statements did not add to net current assets already considered, and Sonegawa factors did not cure the…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the AAO corrected the Director's net income figure (from $133,753 to $17,358), it still found the Petitioner unable to pay the proffered wage. Net income and net current assets were far below the proffered wage, the president's pledged foregone compensation was insufficient and not shown to be discretionary, bank statements did not add to net current assets already considered, and Sonegawa factors did not cure the deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-12_01_B5203; source_row=23068 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Beneficiary's experience letters described IT systems design and software implementation project management, but did not establish experience performing many of the listed duties of the senior sales engineer position, such as establishing new accounts, preparing cost estimates from blueprints, ensuring regulatory compliance, and preparing sales engineering reports.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary's experience letters described IT systems design and software implementation project management, but did not establish experience performing many of the listed duties of the senior sales engineer position, such as establishing new accounts, preparing cost estimates from blueprints, ensuring regulatory compliance, and preparing sales engineering reports.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-12_01_B5203; source_row=23069 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
After the Petitioner submitted required financial documentation in response to AAO's notice of intent to dismiss, AAO found that the Petitioner had established its ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
After the Petitioner submitted required financial documentation in response to AAO's notice of intent to dismiss, AAO found that the Petitioner had established its ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-09-11_01_B5203; source_row=23067 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c