Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found the Petitioner did not explain why the listed criteria do not readily apply to ultramarathon running, did not identify what evidence should be deemed comparable, and noted he had claimed five criteria, undercutting non-applicability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner did not explain why the listed criteria do not readily apply to ultramarathon running, did not identify what evidence should be deemed comparable, and noted he had claimed five criteria, undercutting non-applicability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-09_02_B2203; source_row=22993 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held the argument was raised for the first time on motion supported only by previously submitted evidence, and in any event the race does not meet the narrow standard for a major, internationally recognized award like the Nobel, Pulitzer, Academy Award, or Olympic Medal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held the argument was raised for the first time on motion supported only by previously submitted evidence, and in any event the race does not meet the narrow standard for a major, internationally recognized award like the Nobel, Pulitzer, Academy Award, or Olympic Medal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-09_02_B2203; source_row=22987 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO reasoned the win was already credited under awards, the Petitioner did not corroborate his record-setting claim, and he did not show how the claimed record amounts to a major-significance contribution to the overall field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO reasoned the win was already credited under awards, the Petitioner did not corroborate his record-setting claim, and he did not show how the claimed record amounts to a major-significance contribution to the overall field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-09_02_B2203; source_row=22991 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The updated letter showed only a consulting/employment-like role, not membership conditioned on outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The updated letter showed only a consulting/employment-like role, not membership conditioned on outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-09_02_B2203; source_row=22989 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held the letter described duties but not actual contributions or critical impact, and the organization's reputation (not its director's) must be distinguished, which size and longevity alone do not show.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held the letter described duties but not actual contributions or critical impact, and the organization's reputation (not its director's) must be distinguished, which size and longevity alone do not show.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-09_02_B2203; source_row=22992 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO reaffirmed that being merely mentioned does not constitute material 'about' the petitioner, and that he had not shown runnersworld.com is a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reaffirmed that being merely mentioned does not constitute material 'about' the petitioner, and that he had not shown runnersworld.com is a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-09_02_B2203; source_row=22990 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final Merits Determination
What the decision said
AAO formally reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, but noted in advisory dicta that the record does not support sustained acclaim through the Petitioner's coaching career.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO formally reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, but noted in advisory dicta that the record does not support sustained acclaim through the Petitioner's coaching career.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-09_01_B2203; source_row=22986 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c