Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15521–15530
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that one article appeared to be a paid advertisement and lacked an author attribution; the other two publications were local or regional Venezuelan newspapers whose limited reach did not qualify them as major media; and the Spanish-language magazine articles were inadmissible without certified English translations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that one article appeared to be a paid advertisement and lacked an author attribution; the other two publications were local or regional Venezuelan newspapers whose limited reach did not qualify them as major media; and the Spanish-language magazine articles were inadmissible without certified English translations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-08_01_B2203; source_row=22971 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that while the Petitioner received the award, the submitted evidence—including a single newspaper article about the award's anniversary and a website listing of award recipients—did not establish that the award is nationally or internationally recognized.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that while the Petitioner received the award, the submitted evidence—including a single newspaper article about the award's anniversary and a website listing of award recipients—did not establish that the award is nationally or internationally recognized.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-08_01_B2203; source_row=22970 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social SciencesPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's citation record (11 citations to one article, one to another, none to the rest) was not shown to be comparatively significant, the dissertation downloads lacked evidence of implementation or meaningful engagement, and the record did not demonstrate that her research had affected educational strategies at colleges or universities or generated substantial discourse in the academic community.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's citation record (11 citations to one article, one to another, none to the rest) was not shown to be comparatively significant, the dissertation downloads lacked evidence of implementation or meaningful engagement, and the record did not demonstrate that her research had affected educational strategies at colleges or universities or generated substantial discourse in the academic community.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-08_01_B5203; source_row=22976 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social SciencesPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed research aimed at improving remedial university students' educational success has substantial merit, and that her evidence—including letters from academics, reports, and documentation of broader dissemination—demonstrated national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed research aimed at improving remedial university students' educational success has substantial merit, and that her evidence—including letters from academics, reports, and documentation of broader dissemination—demonstrated national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-08_01_B5203; source_row=22975 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to fully address the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of at least three criteria, but noted that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to fully address the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of at least three criteria, but noted that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-08_01_B2203; source_row=22974 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1ANIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO had previously found the proposed research met prong one but the mentorship/teaching activities did not, and the new evidence on motion did not show benefits extending beyond the program to the broader field.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO had previously found the proposed research met prong one but the mentorship/teaching activities did not, and the new evidence on motion did not show benefits extending beyond the program to the broader field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-08_02_B2203; source_row=22978 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1ANIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the new evidence insufficient: the software-inconsistency finding was not shown to be significant, the landfill report did not show wider use or interest, the post-filing manuscript could not be considered, and citation counts (none over ten) lacked comparative context.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the new evidence insufficient: the software-inconsistency finding was not shown to be significant, the landfill report did not show wider use or interest, the post-filing manuscript could not be considered, and citation counts (none over ten) lacked comparative context.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-08-08_02_B2203; source_row=22979 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c