Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO agreed that the record reflects the Petitioner performed as a member of the ensemble at many artistic exhibitions where her artistic abilities as a dancer were on display.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the record reflects the Petitioner performed as a member of the ensemble at many artistic exhibitions where her artistic abilities as a dancer were on display.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-31_01_B2203; source_row=22947 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the Beneficiary's 2017 W-2 showed wages of $89,308, which was $28,292 below the $117,600 proffered wage, and that the only tax return in the record was for 2016 — predating the May 18, 2017 priority date — leaving a gap in the evidence. Because the 2017 financial documentation was absent, the record was insufficient to assess ability to pay for the relevant period, warranting remand rather than denial.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Beneficiary's 2017 W-2 showed wages of $89,308, which was $28,292 below the $117,600 proffered wage, and that the only tax return in the record was for 2016 — predating the May 18, 2017 priority date — leaving a gap in the evidence. Because the 2017 financial documentation was absent, the record was insufficient to assess ability to pay for the relevant period, warranting remand rather than denial.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-27_01_B5203; source_row=22941 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
36 months of qualifying experience as supplier quality engineer
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the experience letter deficient under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) because it did not include the company's address or the writer's title beyond 'department chief' of an unidentified department.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the experience letter deficient under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) because it did not include the company's address or the writer's title beyond 'department chief' of an unidentified department.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-27_02_B5203; source_row=22943 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary's foreign degree equivalent to U.S. master's in industrial engineering
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the credential evaluations substantively deficient and internally inconsistent with the petitioner's six-year claim, the professor's statement did not address U.S. equivalency or substantiate a six-year structure given the 11-year completion period, and Spanish/MBA documents did not establish U.S. equivalency.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the credential evaluations substantively deficient and internally inconsistent with the petitioner's six-year claim, the professor's statement did not address U.S. equivalency or substantiate a six-year structure given the 11-year completion period, and Spanish/MBA documents did not establish U.S. equivalency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-27_02_B5203; source_row=22942 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The plain language of the criterion requires documentation of the Petitioner's own receipt of prizes or awards. The awards were given to individual dancers and dance groups for their performance, not to the Petitioner for her role as a choreographer.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The plain language of the criterion requires documentation of the Petitioner's own receipt of prizes or awards. The awards were given to individual dancers and dance groups for their performance, not to the Petitioner for her role as a choreographer. The one certificate identifying her did not establish national or international recognition, and remaining certificates were participation acknowledgments, not awards for excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-24_01_B2203; source_row=22930 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The certificate and letter from the association president confirmed that it is the dance school—not the Petitioner personally—that holds membership. Additionally, even if the Petitioner were a member, the evidence does not establish that the association requires outstanding achievements of its individual members, as the 'contact person' membership requires only an application and financial obligations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The certificate and letter from the association president confirmed that it is the dance school—not the Petitioner personally—that holds membership. Additionally, even if the Petitioner were a member, the evidence does not establish that the association requires outstanding achievements of its individual members, as the 'contact person' membership requires only an application and financial obligations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-24_01_B2203; source_row=22931 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's acclaim is regional, not national or international. Media coverage focuses on school operations rather than her choreographic achievements. She has no personal awards for choreography, no critical recognition from peers, and her judging involved amateurs. The evidence does not show she ranks at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's acclaim is regional, not national or international. Media coverage focuses on school operations rather than her choreographic achievements. She has no personal awards for choreography, no critical recognition from peers, and her judging involved amateurs. The evidence does not show she ranks at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-24_01_B2203; source_row=22936 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the new reference letters did not identify specific contributions or their impact on the field, and the book evidence was not supported by any pertinent precedent or regulation showing legal error.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the new reference letters did not identify specific contributions or their impact on the field, and the book evidence was not supported by any pertinent precedent or regulation showing legal error.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-24_02_B2203; source_row=22938 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO noted that the Petitioner did not claim eligibility under this criterion on appeal, and in any event the evidence did not establish that he had written a scholarly article.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the Petitioner did not claim eligibility under this criterion on appeal, and in any event the evidence did not establish that he had written a scholarly article.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-24_02_B2203; source_row=22939 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c