Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
advanced degree professional / labor certification minimum education
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO went further than the Director, identifying conflicting diploma and transcript evidence between this proceeding and the Beneficiary's earlier F-1 visa application. Because the Petitioner did not respond to AAO's NOID/RFE, the authenticity of the documents and the field of study were not established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO went further than the Director, identifying conflicting diploma and transcript evidence between this proceeding and the Beneficiary's earlier F-1 visa application. Because the Petitioner did not respond to AAO's NOID/RFE, the authenticity of the documents and the field of study were not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-17_01_B5203; source_row=22902 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and that the supporting letters demonstrate potential prospective impact in advancing stroke prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, satisfying prong one.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and that the supporting letters demonstrate potential prospective impact in advancing stroke prevention, diagnosis, and treatment, satisfying prong one.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-17_02_B5203; source_row=22906 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The article in which the Petitioner provided a quote does not constitute published material about him. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to establish that the publication is a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The article in which the Petitioner provided a quote does not constitute published material about him. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to establish that the publication is a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-16_01_B2203; source_row=22891 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's inventions were adopted by only a few companies without evidence of field-wide impact. Recommendation letters were conclusory and lacked specific details about the significance of his contributions. Conference invitations alone do not establish original contributions of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's inventions were adopted by only a few companies without evidence of field-wide impact. Recommendation letters were conclusory and lacked specific details about the significance of his contributions. Conference invitations alone do not establish original contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-16_01_B2203; source_row=22892 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the record showed the Petitioner is owner or part-owner of two companies and likely performed a leading role, he did not claim or establish that these organizations have distinguished reputations marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the record showed the Petitioner is owner or part-owner of two companies and likely performed a leading role, he did not claim or establish that these organizations have distinguished reputations marked by eminence, distinction, or excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-16_01_B2203; source_row=22893 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The submitted screenshots either were not primarily about the Petitioner, lacked required date or author information, or were not supported by documentation establishing the websites as professional or major trade publications or other major media. AAO affirmed the Director's finding that this criterion was not met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted screenshots either were not primarily about the Petitioner, lacked required date or author information, or were not supported by documentation establishing the websites as professional or major trade publications or other major media. AAO affirmed the Director's finding that this criterion was not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-16_02_B2203; source_row=22899 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay proffered wage accounting for multiple sponsored beneficiaries
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's 2016 financials show sufficient net income and net current assets in isolation, but USCIS records reveal multiple simultaneous immigrant petitions. The Petitioner must show ability to pay the combined proffered wages of all co-pending petitions, which the current record does not establish.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's 2016 financials show sufficient net income and net current assets in isolation, but USCIS records reveal multiple simultaneous immigrant petitions. The Petitioner must show ability to pay the combined proffered wages of all co-pending petitions, which the current record does not establish.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-16_01_B5203; source_row=22897 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary possesses degree in labor-certification-required field of study
Why AAO was not persuaded
The labor certification plainly lists acceptable fields and states no alternate fields are acceptable. The Beneficiary's degree in 'computer applications' does not match any listed field. The Petitioner's sub-discipline argument is unavailing because the certification as written does not support acceptance of sub-disciplines or related fields.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The labor certification plainly lists acceptable fields and states no alternate fields are acceptable. The Beneficiary's degree in 'computer applications' does not match any listed field. The Petitioner's sub-discipline argument is unavailing because the certification as written does not support acceptance of sub-disciplines or related fields.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-07-16_01_B5203; source_row=22896 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c