Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Labor certification demonstrates need for advanced degree professional
Why AAO was not persuaded
Part H.14's plain language accepting 'Any suitable combination of education and experience' and a foreign equivalency 'as determined by a professional evaluation service' signals acceptance of less than a bachelor's degree, undermining EB-2 classification requirements. The labor certification record already stated the requirements, and additional clarification was unnecessary and contradictory.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Part H.14's plain language accepting 'Any suitable combination of education and experience' and a foreign equivalency 'as determined by a professional evaluation service' signals acceptance of less than a bachelor's degree, undermining EB-2 classification requirements. The labor certification record already stated the requirements, and additional clarification was unnecessary and contradictory. Advertising materials are insufficient because regulations require the labor certification itself to demonstrate the need for an advanced degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-27_01_B5203; source_row=22828 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner submitted only a 2014 tax return, but failed to provide evidence of ability to pay for 2016 (the priority date year) or thereafter. The Petitioner must also account for the combined proffered wages of multiple other immigrant petitions filed or pending after April 25, 2016.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted only a 2014 tax return, but failed to provide evidence of ability to pay for 2016 (the priority date year) or thereafter. The Petitioner must also account for the combined proffered wages of multiple other immigrant petitions filed or pending after April 25, 2016.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-27_01_B5203; source_row=22829 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters confirm employment but do not indicate leadership positions or that the Petitioner's role as mountain guide rose to a critical level (e.g., increased revenue or participation). Additionally, the organizations' distinguished reputations were not established with specific documentation, and participation in a documentary did not demonstrate a leading role for an organization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters confirm employment but do not indicate leadership positions or that the Petitioner's role as mountain guide rose to a critical level (e.g., increased revenue or participation). Additionally, the organizations' distinguished reputations were not established with specific documentation, and participation in a documentary did not demonstrate a leading role for an organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-26_01_B2203; source_row=22822 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The letters do not show that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and no other record evidence demonstrates such recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters do not show that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field, and no other record evidence demonstrates such recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-26_01_B2203; source_row=22819 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The expert letters praise the Petitioner's skills and recount personal accomplishments but do not explain specific contributions of major significance to the field. Letters that repeat regulatory language without showing how contributions have already influenced the field are insufficient, and USCIS need not accept conclusory statements.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The expert letters praise the Petitioner's skills and recount personal accomplishments but do not explain specific contributions of major significance to the field. Letters that repeat regulatory language without showing how contributions have already influenced the field are insufficient, and USCIS need not accept conclusory statements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-26_01_B2203; source_row=22821 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the conference and alumni evidence post-dated the filing of the petition, and the remaining evidence did not show sufficient interest from customers/investors or that her track record renders her well positioned to advance the consulting endeavor.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the conference and alumni evidence post-dated the filing of the petition, and the remaining evidence did not show sufficient interest from customers/investors or that her track record renders her well positioned to advance the consulting endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-26_01_B5203; source_row=22825 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record contains an article reflecting published material about the Petitioner relating to his field, and the AAO concurred with the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contains an article reflecting published material about the Petitioner relating to his field, and the AAO concurred with the Director's finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-26_01_B2203; source_row=22820 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not establish the required acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not establish the required acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-26_01_B2203; source_row=22823 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO applied the plain language of the labor certification, which required 24 months of experience in the job offered (high school math teacher) and barred experience in alternate occupations.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO applied the plain language of the labor certification, which required 24 months of experience in the job offered (high school math teacher) and barred experience in alternate occupations. The Beneficiary's university-level teaching assistant duties — tutoring, recitations, and grading — did not encompass the curriculum development and classroom teaching of grades 9–12 central to the offered position, making that experience an alternate occupation and therefore non-qualifying.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-26_02_B5203; source_row=22827 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found insufficient information to establish that the Petitioner's consulting work has implications beyond her company and its potential clients, and she did not demonstrate wider impact on her field or the U.S. economy.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found insufficient information to establish that the Petitioner's consulting work has implications beyond her company and its potential clients, and she did not demonstrate wider impact on her field or the U.S. economy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-26_01_B5203; source_row=22824 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c