Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15691–15700
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the Petitioner has conducted and published research during her graduate studies, she has not shown her research has been frequently cited, affected clinical practice, generated substantial positive discourse, or otherwise demonstrated a record of success beyond her home institution.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner has conducted and published research during her graduate studies, she has not shown her research has been frequently cited, affected clinical practice, generated substantial positive discourse, or otherwise demonstrated a record of success beyond her home institution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-20_01_B5203; source_row=22792 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed research in counseling and educational psychology has substantial merit given its focus on dropout rates and psychological well-being, and that the evidence—including faculty letters and academic articles—established national importance through potential prospective impact.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed research in counseling and educational psychology has substantial merit given its focus on dropout rates and psychological well-being, and that the evidence—including faculty letters and academic articles—established national importance through potential prospective impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-20_01_B5203; source_row=22791 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the media reports focused on prospective potential impact rather than established major significance; conference presentations and publication alone do not establish major significance without evidence of impact; citation counts did not demonstrate major influence in the field; and recommendation letters were primarily conclusory, speculating on future potential rather than demonstrating already-achieved majo…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the media reports focused on prospective potential impact rather than established major significance; conference presentations and publication alone do not establish major significance without evidence of impact; citation counts did not demonstrate major influence in the field; and recommendation letters were primarily conclusory, speculating on future potential rather than demonstrating already-achieved major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=22788 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to formally reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in an advisory comment that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to formally reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in an advisory comment that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=22790 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The salary comparison sources were unreliable as they were based on user-submitted data, and the bank statements showed income from multiple different sources during the same period, calling their reliability and relevance into question.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The salary comparison sources were unreliable as they were based on user-submitted data, and the bank statements showed income from multiple different sources during the same period, calling their reliability and relevance into question.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_03_B2203; source_row=22786 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The 2001 article lacked a properly certified English translation, preventing meaningful evaluation. The 2002 article's publishing entity was not established in the record.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The 2001 article lacked a properly certified English translation, preventing meaningful evaluation. The 2002 article's publishing entity was not established in the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_03_B2203; source_row=22784 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The organization was open to all auditors and accountants meeting minimum expertise requirements, not requiring outstanding achievements as a prerequisite for membership. The invitation to submit articles came after the Petitioner joined, not as a condition of joining.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The organization was open to all auditors and accountants meeting minimum expertise requirements, not requiring outstanding achievements as a prerequisite for membership. The invitation to submit articles came after the Petitioner joined, not as a condition of joining.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_03_B2203; source_row=22781 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c