Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 15711–15720

EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the display criterion on motion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the display criterion on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_01_B2203; source_row=22769
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the published material criterion on motion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the published material criterion on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_01_B2203; source_row=22765
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the contributions of major significance criterion on motion.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not submit new evidence related to the contributions of major significance criterion on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_01_B2203; source_row=22767
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership

Why AAO was not persuaded

The bylaws showed that membership requires nomination by two existing members and certain educational or experiential backgrounds in chemical sciences, but this does not demonstrate that outstanding achievements are required for membership.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The bylaws showed that membership requires nomination by two existing members and certain educational or experiential backgrounds in chemical sciences, but this does not demonstrate that outstanding achievements are required for membership.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_01_B2203; source_row=22764
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found in its prior appeal decision that the Petitioner met criterion (vii) for display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, the only criterion found met.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found in its prior appeal decision that the Petitioner met criterion (vii) for display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, the only criterion found met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_02_B2203; source_row=22778
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO had previously found the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion; this finding was not disturbed on motion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO had previously found the Petitioner met the scholarly articles criterion; this finding was not disturbed on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_01_B2203; source_row=22768
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the record lacked the required documentary categories for 2016, that 2014 and 2015 audited statements showed negative net income and net current assets, and that ability to pay multiple petitions was not established.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the record lacked the required documentary categories for 2016, that 2014 and 2015 audited statements showed negative net income and net current assets, and that ability to pay multiple petitions was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_01_B5203; source_row=22772
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

offered position remains the same as on labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the change in primary worksite from Massachusetts to California changed the prevailing wage by nearly $20,000 and could have affected recruitment of U.S. workers, so the job opportunity is not the same.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the change in primary worksite from Massachusetts to California changed the prevailing wage by nearly $20,000 and could have affected recruitment of U.S. workers, so the job opportunity is not the same.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_01_B5203; source_row=22770
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary's possession of DOL-certified experience and special skills by priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the company letter confirmed only title and dates, not duties or skills, and the manager's letter lacked corroboration of his affiliation with the former employer, so the Beneficiary's qualifying experience was not established.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the company letter confirmed only title and dates, not duties or skills, and the manager's letter lacked corroboration of his affiliation with the former employer, so the Beneficiary's qualifying experience was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_01_B5203; source_row=22773
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

timing of acquisition relative to labor certification filing

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO held neither USCIS nor DOL policy permits successorship based on an acquisition that occurred more than three years before the labor certification's filing, and that the record does not establish the labor certification employer's intention to employ the Beneficiary as of the certification application's filing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO held neither USCIS nor DOL policy permits successorship based on an acquisition that occurred more than three years before the labor certification's filing, and that the record does not establish the labor certification employer's intention to employ the Beneficiary as of the certification application's filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-06-15_01_B5203; source_row=22771
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment