Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15761–15770
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · EB-2 baseline
advanced degree qualification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's Korean doctorate in hotel tourism management was not accompanied by a credentials evaluation establishing equivalency to a U.S. degree, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(A).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's Korean doctorate in hotel tourism management was not accompanied by a credentials evaluation establishing equivalency to a U.S. degree, as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(A).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_03_B5203; source_row=22709 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The membership card was dated more than one year after filing, failing the eligibility-at-time-of-filing requirement. Even if timely, the membership requirements did not establish that outstanding achievements are required of regular members.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The membership card was dated more than one year after filing, failing the eligibility-at-time-of-filing requirement. Even if timely, the membership requirements did not establish that outstanding achievements are required of regular members.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_02_B2203; source_row=22696 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the individual in professional or major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The printout provided no information about the Petitioner or his work beyond a conference abstract, and the record contained no evidence that the website qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The printout provided no information about the Petitioner or his work beyond a conference abstract, and the record contained no evidence that the website qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_02_B2203; source_row=22697 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found inconsistencies in the letter describing the award, making it impossible to determine the award was given for excellence in chemical science. Reviewer certificates were found not to meet the criterion due to discrepancies undermining reliability and the manner of their distribution.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found inconsistencies in the letter describing the award, making it impossible to determine the award was given for excellence in chemical science. Reviewer certificates were found not to meet the criterion due to discrepancies undermining reliability and the manner of their distribution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_02_B2203; source_row=22695 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The COO letter indicated only potential applications of the Petitioner's research and did not show actual impact on the field. The second letter made only vague, unsupported assertions about the Petitioner's work without identifying specific contributions.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The COO letter indicated only potential applications of the Petitioner's research and did not show actual impact on the field. The second letter made only vague, unsupported assertions about the Petitioner's work without identifying specific contributions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_02_B2203; source_row=22699 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The documents did not describe how the Petitioner played a leading or critical role at the institutions, and the record contained no evidence regarding the reputation of these institutions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The documents did not describe how the Petitioner played a leading or critical role at the institutions, and the record contained no evidence regarding the reputation of these institutions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_02_B2203; source_row=22701 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner's written work was not shown to be scholarly in nature. Translations of article content and information about intended audience were not provided, and the descriptions of the work characterized it as essays, opinions, and commentary rather than scholarly work.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's written work was not shown to be scholarly in nature. Translations of article content and information about intended audience were not provided, and the descriptions of the work characterized it as essays, opinions, and commentary rather than scholarly work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_04_B2203; source_row=22716 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's nine Internet articles from 2012–2016, judging service as deputy editor-in-chief, publication of eight articles and books with ~159 citations (predominantly by students), a local festival award, and four recommendation letters collectively failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field of journalism and au…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's nine Internet articles from 2012–2016, judging service as deputy editor-in-chief, publication of eight articles and books with ~159 citations (predominantly by students), a local festival award, and four recommendation letters collectively failed to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field of journalism and authorship.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_04_B2203; source_row=22718 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that three of the nine screenshots did not reflect published material about the Petitioner but rather covered his books and a song. The remaining six screenshots were about him, but none were shown to be from professional or major trade publications or other major media. Some screenshots also lacked author attribution.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that three of the nine screenshots did not reflect published material about the Petitioner but rather covered his books and a song. The remaining six screenshots were about him, but none were shown to be from professional or major trade publications or other major media. Some screenshots also lacked author attribution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_04_B2203; source_row=22713 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record did not support the Director's determination that the Petitioner made original contributions of major significance, as the evidence did not show her work had greatly influenced the overall field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record did not support the Director's determination that the Petitioner made original contributions of major significance, as the evidence did not show her work had greatly influenced the overall field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_03_B2203; source_row=22706 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c