Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 15771–15780

EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the reference letters focused on local/state-level impact rather than the field as a whole, that the media articles did not demonstrate wide-spread field-level influence, and that the research collaboration only studied the effectiveness of the model rather than demonstrating widespread implementation. The Petitioner showed originality but not major significance to the field.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the reference letters focused on local/state-level impact rather than the field as a whole, that the media articles did not demonstrate wide-spread field-level influence, and that the research collaboration only studied the effectiveness of the model rather than demonstrating widespread implementation. The Petitioner showed originality but not major significance to the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_01_B2203; source_row=22689
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

labor certification supports advanced degree professional classification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees the labor certification's plain-language requirements (bachelor's plus one year) cannot support advanced-degree-professional classification, regardless of the position's claimed actual minimum requirements or the Beneficiary's individual credentials.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the labor certification's plain-language requirements (bachelor's plus one year) cannot support advanced-degree-professional classification, regardless of the position's claimed actual minimum requirements or the Beneficiary's individual credentials.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_02_B5203; source_row=22703
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach the second prong because the petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the second prong because the petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_03_B5203; source_row=22711
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

What the decision said

AAO declined to reach the third prong because the petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_03_B5203; source_row=22712
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

Despite discrepancies regarding one reviewer certificate, the remaining evidence establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the Petitioner meets this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
Despite discrepancies regarding one reviewer certificate, the remaining evidence establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the Petitioner meets this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_02_B2203; source_row=22698
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, though noted the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, though noted the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_02_B2203; source_row=22702
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner meets this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner meets this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_02_B2203; source_row=22700
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

other

Five years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience

Why AAO was not persuaded

The credential evaluation establishes the Beneficiary's bachelor's degree equivalent was not earned until March 2011. The Petitioner's own payroll records do not support a 30-hour work week, and the Beneficiary attested to only 25 hours per week on the labor certification, yielding only 46 months of full-time-equivalent experience — below the required 60 months.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The credential evaluation establishes the Beneficiary's bachelor's degree equivalent was not earned until March 2011. The Petitioner's own payroll records do not support a 30-hour work week, and the Beneficiary attested to only 25 hours per week on the labor certification, yielding only 46 months of full-time-equivalent experience — below the required 60 months.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_01_B5203; source_row=22693
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Chemistry / Chemical Engineering

Issue evaluated

other

Experience with same employer in substantially different position (20 C.F.R. § 656.17(i))

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the Petitioner did not demonstrate impracticality of training a U.S. worker, and the record showed substantial overlap in job duties between the offered position and the Beneficiary's prior roles with the Petitioner, meaning the same-employer experience cannot be credited.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner did not demonstrate impracticality of training a U.S. worker, and the record showed substantial overlap in job duties between the offered position and the Beneficiary's prior roles with the Petitioner, meaning the same-employer experience cannot be credited.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_01_B5203; source_row=22694
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherManager

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role

What the decision said

AAO did not separately address this criterion in its step-1 analysis.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately address this criterion in its step-1 analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-30_04_B2203; source_row=22717
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment