Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letter's assertion about membership requirements lacked specificity and was not corroborated. The submitted FILA regulations document did not address membership requirements, and the record lacked evidence that recognized experts judge prospective members' achievements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The reference letter's assertion about membership requirements lacked specificity and was not corroborated. The submitted FILA regulations document did not address membership requirements, and the record lacked evidence that recognized experts judge prospective members' achievements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22681 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
Original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
Using a coaching technique based on a well-established Georgian wrestling style does not constitute an original contribution, and there was no evidence the technique had any impact beyond the Petitioner's own students.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Using a coaching technique based on a well-established Georgian wrestling style does not constitute an original contribution, and there was no evidence the technique had any impact beyond the Petitioner's own students.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22684 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record did not establish the Petitioner performed as a referee for the claimed organization, did not confirm an official coaching capacity, and conflicting letters described his role differently (volunteer coach, consultant, sparring partner). No evidence established the organization had a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record did not establish the Petitioner performed as a referee for the claimed organization, did not confirm an official coaching capacity, and conflicting letters described his role differently (volunteer coach, consultant, sparring partner). No evidence established the organization had a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22686 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
Final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record would not support extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record would not support extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22687 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While the Petitioner held an International Referee card, the record did not demonstrate he had actually performed as a referee for the claimed organization, and a supporting letter did not mention his referee service. The record also lacked explanation of how referee duties qualify under this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
While the Petitioner held an International Referee card, the record did not demonstrate he had actually performed as a referee for the claimed organization, and a supporting letter did not mention his referee service. The record also lacked explanation of how referee duties qualify under this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22683 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record establishes that the Petitioner won multiple first, second, and third place finishes at national-level wrestling competitions, and the translation certifications met regulatory requirements. AAO disagreed with the Director's finding on this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record establishes that the Petitioner won multiple first, second, and third place finishes at national-level wrestling competitions, and the translation certifications met regulatory requirements. AAO disagreed with the Director's finding on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-29_01_B2203; source_row=22680 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner provided only a 2015 tax return, but the priority date is June 17, 2016, so evidence of ability to pay for 2016 and later years was required. Additionally, USCIS records indicated multiple concurrent immigrant petitions, requiring demonstration of ability to pay combined proffered wages.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner provided only a 2015 tax return, but the priority date is June 17, 2016, so evidence of ability to pay for 2016 and later years was required. Additionally, USCIS records indicated multiple concurrent immigrant petitions, requiring demonstration of ability to pay combined proffered wages.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-24_01_B5203; source_row=22678 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary possession of required degree in acceptable field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that neither evaluation supported possession of a qualifying degree in computer science or the other accepted fields. The education-only evaluation concluded only a business administration equivalency, which is not listed on the labor certification, and the petitioner's own evaluations contradicted its claim that the Beneficiary had a computer science degree equivalent.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that neither evaluation supported possession of a qualifying degree in computer science or the other accepted fields. The education-only evaluation concluded only a business administration equivalency, which is not listed on the labor certification, and the petitioner's own evaluations contradicted its claim that the Beneficiary had a computer science degree equivalent.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-24_01_B5203; source_row=22677 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the producer's letter did not specify what the Petitioner actually did at the event and thus did not establish a leading or critical role; the petitioner's appellate claim that she performed the role yearly contradicted the letter, and the organization's distinguished reputation was not demonstrated.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the producer's letter did not specify what the Petitioner actually did at the event and thus did not establish a leading or critical role; the petitioner's appellate claim that she performed the role yearly contradicted the letter, and the organization's distinguished reputation was not demonstrated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-17_01_B2203; source_row=22668 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c