Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15821–15830
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO declined to analyze the third prong because the Petitioner had not established the second prong, making further balancing analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to analyze the third prong because the Petitioner had not established the second prong, making further balancing analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-11_01_B5203; source_row=22654 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other31 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
Even assuming a third criterion were met, the totality of the evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Even assuming a third criterion were met, the totality of the evidence does not show sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-08_01_B2203; source_row=22649 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that letters about the Petitioner's roles at the ITF-affiliated organizations described his work in general terms without establishing impact or corroborating evidence, and the organizations' distinguished reputation was not substantiated.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that letters about the Petitioner's roles at the ITF-affiliated organizations described his work in general terms without establishing impact or corroborating evidence, and the organizations' distinguished reputation was not substantiated. While the Petitioner may have held a leading role as founder and president of his martial arts school, the school did not have an independently demonstrated distinguished reputation, as photographs of trophies lacked identifying information and testimonial letters were uncorroborated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-08_01_B2203; source_row=22648 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other31 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the prior decision correct: articles with only excerpt translations had limited probative value, and among fully translated articles only two mentioned the Petitioner but were not about him.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the prior decision correct: articles with only excerpt translations had limited probative value, and among fully translated articles only two mentioned the Petitioner but were not about him. New evidence on reopening was also insufficient: at least half the articles lacked required bibliographic information, most were not about the Petitioner, and the television interview lacked required title/date/author and post-dated the filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-08_01_B2203; source_row=22646 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Qualifying affiliate relationship between petitioner and foreign employer
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner's own evidence confirmed that the relevant Canadian entity was solely owned by the owner's son, not by the individual who owns the Petitioner, meaning there was no common ownership at the time of the Beneficiary's employment or at filing. Matter of Hughes does not support a qualifying relationship where there is no common ownership at all.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's own evidence confirmed that the relevant Canadian entity was solely owned by the owner's son, not by the individual who owns the Petitioner, meaning there was no common ownership at the time of the Beneficiary's employment or at filing. Matter of Hughes does not support a qualifying relationship where there is no common ownership at all. The claimed amalgamation was inadequately documented and the inconsistencies in ownership evidence were not resolved.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-08_02_B2203; source_row=22650 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the Beneficiary's duties were primarily administrative and operational rather than managerial. Because the Beneficiary was the sole full-time employee, all non-driving tasks fell to him personally, making his role operationally hands-on rather than managerial. This distinguished his foreign position from his U.S. position where he oversees three subordinate supervisors.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Beneficiary's duties were primarily administrative and operational rather than managerial. Because the Beneficiary was the sole full-time employee, all non-driving tasks fell to him personally, making his role operationally hands-on rather than managerial. This distinguished his foreign position from his U.S. position where he oversees three subordinate supervisors.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-08_02_B2203; source_row=22651 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Physics20 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that while the Petitioner's work on radio relics received attention and her data was relied upon by others, the evidence did not establish that her contributions rose to the level of major significance. The software showed only limited adoption, and a key supporter acknowledged the Petitioner's alternative explanation had not displaced the traditional theory.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that while the Petitioner's work on radio relics received attention and her data was relied upon by others, the evidence did not establish that her contributions rose to the level of major significance. The software showed only limited adoption, and a key supporter acknowledged the Petitioner's alternative explanation had not displaced the traditional theory. Citation counts and publication rankings alone were insufficient to establish major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-03_01_B2203; source_row=22634 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Beneficiary's South Korean bachelor's degree was not accompanied by a credentials evaluation showing foreign equivalency to a U.S. advanced degree, and no employer letters demonstrated the required five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience to establish equivalency to a master's degree. The Petitioner waived the issue by not addressing it on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary's South Korean bachelor's degree was not accompanied by a credentials evaluation showing foreign equivalency to a U.S. advanced degree, and no employer letters demonstrated the required five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience to establish equivalency to a master's degree. The Petitioner waived the issue by not addressing it on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-05-03_01_B5203; source_row=22637 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c