Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15841–15850
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO weighed the totality of the evidence and found the Petitioner's peer review work, 12 scholarly articles, critical role at a distinguished institution, and limited media coverage did not collectively demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement at the very top of the field.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO weighed the totality of the evidence and found the Petitioner's peer review work, 12 scholarly articles, critical role at a distinguished institution, and limited media coverage did not collectively demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or placement at the very top of the field. Citation history was absent, the editorial board appointment post-dated the priority date, and the media coverage was not about the Petitioner himself.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-30_01_B2203; source_row=22629 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
critical role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO reversed the Director, finding that the evidence of the lab's distinguished reputation as an integral part of an Ivy League institution, combined with the Petitioner's unique expertise in echocardiograms on rodents and its key effect on research, established the criterion was met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the Director, finding that the evidence of the lab's distinguished reputation as an integral part of an Ivy League institution, combined with the Petitioner's unique expertise in echocardiograms on rodents and its key effect on research, established the criterion was met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-30_01_B2203; source_row=22628 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original scientific contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed this criterion was not met, noting the editorial board appointment appeared to post-date the priority date, the clinical professor appointment was not sufficient to show sustained acclaim, and there was no evidence of how the research influenced others or furthered the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed this criterion was not met, noting the editorial board appointment appeared to post-date the priority date, the clinical professor appointment was not sufficient to show sustained acclaim, and there was no evidence of how the research influenced others or furthered the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-30_01_B2203; source_row=22626 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to establish membership in any professional association; AAO noted there is no requirement to meet this specific criterion but affirmed he did not meet it.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to establish membership in any professional association; AAO noted there is no requirement to meet this specific criterion but affirmed he did not meet it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-27_01_B5203; source_row=22622 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
license or certification for profession or occupation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The sales license for home improvement does not relate to the Petitioner's stated profession as an entrepreneur, and business registrations do not qualify as a professional license or certification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The sales license for home improvement does not relate to the Petitioner's stated profession as an entrepreneur, and business registrations do not qualify as a professional license or certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-27_01_B5203; source_row=22620 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
commanding a high salary or other remuneration for services demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The submitted documents show company-level project earnings and contracts but do not indicate personal remuneration to the Petitioner, so they do not satisfy this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted documents show company-level project earnings and contracts but do not indicate personal remuneration to the Petitioner, so they do not satisfy this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-27_01_B5203; source_row=22621 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letter from the accountant describes consulting and finance support provided to the Petitioner's projects but does not constitute recognition for achievements and significant contributions by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letter from the accountant describes consulting and finance support provided to the Petitioner's projects but does not constitute recognition for achievements and significant contributions by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-27_01_B5203; source_row=22623 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The new employer letter contradicts the Petitioner's own resume and Form 9098 showing only about one year of employment; the accountant letter is from a non-employer and does not establish ten years of full-time experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The new employer letter contradicts the Petitioner's own resume and Form 9098 showing only about one year of employment; the accountant letter is from a non-employer and does not establish ten years of full-time experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-27_01_B5203; source_row=22619 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c