Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 15891–15900

NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay via wages paid to beneficiary

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Beneficiary received $17,952 in both 2015 and 2016, which was $27,048 below the proffered wage of $45,000. AAO rejected the argument to prorate wages, noting that the Beneficiary was employed part-time all of 2015 and only a fraction of the $17,952 was earned after the priority date.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary received $17,952 in both 2015 and 2016, which was $27,048 below the proffered wage of $45,000. AAO rejected the argument to prorate wages, noting that the Beneficiary was employed part-time all of 2015 and only a fraction of the $17,952 was earned after the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-17_01_B5203; source_row=22576
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay via totality of circumstances

Why AAO was not persuaded

The period of growing gross receipts was not long enough and the volume not large enough to demonstrate a historical pattern of growth. The claimed reallocation of 'outside services' expenditures was speculative with no evidence provided. Projected future revenue increases would not retroactively establish past ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The period of growing gross receipts was not long enough and the volume not large enough to demonstrate a historical pattern of growth. The claimed reallocation of 'outside services' expenditures was speculative with no evidence provided. Projected future revenue increases would not retroactively establish past ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-17_01_B5203; source_row=22579
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Labor certification requires advanced degree or equivalent

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO determined that the additional language in H.14 beyond standard Kellogg language does not permit anything less than an advanced degree, because the language restricts any suitable combination to being equivalent to the actual minimum requirements (master's degree + 24 months, or bachelor's degree + 5 years).

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO determined that the additional language in H.14 beyond standard Kellogg language does not permit anything less than an advanced degree, because the language restricts any suitable combination to being equivalent to the actual minimum requirements (master's degree + 24 months, or bachelor's degree + 5 years).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-13_01_B5203; source_row=22571
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the record did not describe duties performed or establish the distinguished reputation of the organizations.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the record did not describe duties performed or establish the distinguished reputation of the organizations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-11_02_B2203; source_row=22568
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AComparable evidenceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

Comparable evidence

comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO held comparable evidence is unavailable because the regulatory criteria readily apply to her occupation; she addressed seven of the ten criteria.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO held comparable evidence is unavailable because the regulatory criteria readily apply to her occupation; she addressed seven of the ten criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-11_02_B2203; source_row=22569
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed with the Director, finding no circulation data establishing major-media status, improperly certified translations, and minimal weight given to Wikipedia entries.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director, finding no circulation data establishing major-media status, improperly certified translations, and minimal weight given to Wikipedia entries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-11_02_B2203; source_row=22564
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the record lacked evidence that the various awards were given for excellence in cinematography or that they enjoy national or international recognition in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the record lacked evidence that the various awards were given for excellence in cinematography or that they enjoy national or international recognition in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-11_02_B2203; source_row=22562
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the letters showed only that she was invited, not that she actually judged, and the photographs and record did not establish she judged the work of others in the same or allied field.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the letters showed only that she was invited, not that she actually judged, and the photographs and record did not establish she judged the work of others in the same or allied field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-11_02_B2203; source_row=22565
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Major award

one-time major internationally recognized award

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Certificate of Honor, a 'special gratitude award' from a film market, was not shown to be globally recognized comparable to a Nobel, Academy Award, or Olympic medal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Certificate of Honor, a 'special gratitude award' from a film market, was not shown to be globally recognized comparable to a Nobel, Academy Award, or Olympic medal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-11_02_B2203; source_row=22561
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO did not formally reach final merits but observed in the aggregate the record fails to show sustained acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not formally reach final merits but observed in the aggregate the record fails to show sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-11_02_B2203; source_row=22570
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment