Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 15901–15910

EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner did not challenge the Director's finding on appeal, and AAO noted the record supports the Director's conclusion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not challenge the Director's finding on appeal, and AAO noted the record supports the Director's conclusion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-11_02_B2203; source_row=22563
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found uniqueness alone insufficient and no evidence the festival or her work has significantly impacted the field of cinematography.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found uniqueness alone insufficient and no evidence the festival or her work has significantly impacted the field of cinematography.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-11_02_B2203; source_row=22566
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed the record confirms her films were displayed at various film festivals.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the record confirms her films were displayed at various film festivals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-11_02_B2203; source_row=22567
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalPhD20 papers

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

authorship of published scientific or scholarly articles in the field

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the 20 articles were published in journals focused on neuroscience, biomedicine, and pharmacology — not public health or epidemiology. One potentially broader journal was not shown to have published the Beneficiary's epidemiological research. The 2013 data book contribution was in public health but was not shown to be an international professional journal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the 20 articles were published in journals focused on neuroscience, biomedicine, and pharmacology — not public health or epidemiology. One potentially broader journal was not shown to have published the Beneficiary's epidemiological research. The 2013 data book contribution was in public health but was not shown to be an international professional journal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-10_01_B5203; source_row=22560
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalPhD20 papers

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

judging the work of others

Why AAO was not persuaded

While AAO disagreed with the Director's credibility ruling on the reviewer letter, AAO still found the criterion unmet because the evidence did not establish that the manuscripts reviewed were in the field of public health or an allied field — the journals were focused on pharmacology and biochemistry, not public health.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
While AAO disagreed with the Director's credibility ruling on the reviewer letter, AAO still found the criterion unmet because the evidence did not establish that the manuscripts reviewed were in the field of public health or an allied field — the journals were focused on pharmacology and biochemistry, not public health.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-10_01_B5203; source_row=22558
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalPhD20 papers

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

original scientific or scholarly research contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The patent application lacked a certified translation and thus could not be evaluated. Citation evidence related to the Beneficiary's neurology/biochemistry work, not public health. Her public health contributions (fact sheets, data book entry) did not demonstrate major significance impact on the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The patent application lacked a certified translation and thus could not be evaluated. Citation evidence related to the Beneficiary's neurology/biochemistry work, not public health. Her public health contributions (fact sheets, data book entry) did not demonstrate major significance impact on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-10_01_B5203; source_row=22559
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets minimum education requirement on labor certification

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO reviewed the materials submitted on appeal and found that the Beneficiary holds the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree in engineering, computer science, or a related field, satisfying the labor certification's minimum education requirement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO reviewed the materials submitted on appeal and found that the Beneficiary holds the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree in engineering, computer science, or a related field, satisfying the labor certification's minimum education requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-05_01_B5203; source_row=22556
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay proffered wage

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO conducted a thorough review of all evidence, including materials submitted on appeal, and concluded the Petitioner established its ability to pay the proffered wage.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO conducted a thorough review of all evidence, including materials submitted on appeal, and concluded the Petitioner established its ability to pay the proffered wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-05_01_B5203; source_row=22557
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Physics

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

Petitioner peer reviewed manuscripts for multiple journals.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner peer reviewed manuscripts for multiple journals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-04_02_B2203; source_row=22552
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Physics

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why the evidence was persuasive

Petitioner made original theoretical contributions to understanding the spin Seebeck effect that are of major significance in the field.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner made original theoretical contributions to understanding the spin Seebeck effect that are of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-04_02_B2203; source_row=22553
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment