Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15911–15920
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Physics
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concludes that the citation history, recommendation letters, judging experience, and widespread use of the Petitioner's work establish sustained acclaim and top-of-field status, contrary to the Director's determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes that the citation history, recommendation letters, judging experience, and widespread use of the Petitioner's work establish sustained acclaim and top-of-field status, contrary to the Director's determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-04_02_B2203; source_row=22555 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the totality of evidence—unusually high citations, expert attestations of top-of-field status, patents and commercialized inventions, cover features in leading journals, and ongoing citation at top-of-field levels—established sustained acclaim and extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the totality of evidence—unusually high citations, expert attestations of top-of-field status, patents and commercialized inventions, cover features in leading journals, and ongoing citation at top-of-field levels—established sustained acclaim and extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-04_01_B2203; source_row=22551 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences15 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's citation record, expert letters, and software did not demonstrate contributions of major significance. Citations were used only as background information, prospective industry interest was not sufficient, and recommendation letters did not show actual field-wide impact.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's citation record, expert letters, and software did not demonstrate contributions of major significance. Citations were used only as background information, prospective industry interest was not sufficient, and recommendation letters did not show actual field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-03_01_B2203; source_row=22544 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay combined proffered wages of $144,885. The wages paid ($99,999.98) left a gap of $44,885.02 that exceeded both net income ($31,488) and net current assets ($1,016). The excusal-from-combined-wages policy did not apply because the Petitioner did not pay the Beneficiary her full proffered wage.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay combined proffered wages of $144,885. The wages paid ($99,999.98) left a gap of $44,885.02 that exceeded both net income ($31,488) and net current assets ($1,016). The excusal-from-combined-wages policy did not apply because the Petitioner did not pay the Beneficiary her full proffered wage. The other beneficiary was also not fully paid the $60,000 proffered wage ($45,000 actually paid). Sonegawa factors did not overcome the deficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-03_02_B5203; source_row=22547 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record did not establish that outstanding achievements are required for Shaolin Temple membership, since most members begin around age eight based on devotion to Kung Fu and Buddhism.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record did not establish that outstanding achievements are required for Shaolin Temple membership, since most members begin around age eight based on devotion to Kung Fu and Buddhism.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-02_01_B2203; source_row=22539 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Although a letter asserted Petitioner is 'a leading member' of the Shaolin Temple, the record lacked specific information demonstrating his position qualified as a leading role.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although a letter asserted Petitioner is 'a leading member' of the Shaolin Temple, the record lacked specific information demonstrating his position qualified as a leading role.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-04-02_01_B2203; source_row=22542 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c