Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 15941–15950

NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

single foreign equivalent degree to U.S. baccalaureate plus five years progressive experience

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the credential evaluations relied on a 3-for-1 experience-to-education equivalence applicable only to H-1B nonimmigrant cases, not immigrant petitions, and that work experience cannot substitute for a single foreign equivalent degree.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the credential evaluations relied on a 3-for-1 experience-to-education equivalence applicable only to H-1B nonimmigrant cases, not immigrant petitions, and that work experience cannot substitute for a single foreign equivalent degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-26_01_B5203; source_row=22503
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Unaudited financial statements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The financial statements were not independently audited, making them likely management representations that lack the reliability of audited statements or tax returns signed under penalty of perjury.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The financial statements were not independently audited, making them likely management representations that lack the reliability of audited statements or tax returns signed under penalty of perjury.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-26_03_B5203; source_row=22512
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Wages paid to beneficiary

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner paid the Beneficiary $71,769.22 in 2014 and $92,192.94 in 2015, both of which are less than the proffered wage of $106,000 per year.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner paid the Beneficiary $71,769.22 in 2014 and $92,192.94 in 2015, both of which are less than the proffered wage of $106,000 per year.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-26_03_B5203; source_row=22508
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Bank account statements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner did not establish that the bank funds represent unconsidered net current assets separate from those already reflected on the 2015 tax return, so they do not add anything to the ability-to-pay analysis.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not establish that the bank funds represent unconsidered net current assets separate from those already reflected on the 2015 tax return, so they do not add anything to the ability-to-pay analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-26_03_B5203; source_row=22513
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary possession of required experience by priority date

Why AAO was not persuaded

Only 16 months of experience was documented from one former employer. The second employer's experience lacked a proper verification letter, and the coworker affidavit lacked independent corroboration. The Petitioner's own employment of the Beneficiary could not be counted without proof of a substantially different position or impracticality of training. The combined documented experience fell short of three years.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Only 16 months of experience was documented from one former employer. The second employer's experience lacked a proper verification letter, and the coworker affidavit lacked independent corroboration. The Petitioner's own employment of the Beneficiary could not be counted without proof of a substantially different position or impracticality of training. The combined documented experience fell short of three years.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-26_03_B5203; source_row=22516
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

CFO letter and accounts receivable

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record does not include documentation of accounts receivable to corroborate the CFO's claim. The CFO's omission of over $2.7 million in current liabilities was unsupported, and the claim that those liabilities were not due within a year contradicts how they were categorized on the tax returns.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record does not include documentation of accounts receivable to corroborate the CFO's claim. The CFO's omission of over $2.7 million in current liabilities was unsupported, and the claim that those liabilities were not due within a year contradicts how they were categorized on the tax returns.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-26_03_B5203; source_row=22511
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Sonegawa totality of circumstances

Why AAO was not persuaded

Although the Petitioner has been in business since 1992 and had 91 employees with slight revenue growth, it did not demonstrate uncharacteristic losses or expenses, an outstanding industry reputation, or the Beneficiary's replacement of a current employee, as present in Sonegawa. The need to cover multiple beneficiaries' wages further distinguishes the case.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner has been in business since 1992 and had 91 employees with slight revenue growth, it did not demonstrate uncharacteristic losses or expenses, an outstanding industry reputation, or the Beneficiary's replacement of a current employee, as present in Sonegawa. The need to cover multiple beneficiaries' wages further distinguishes the case.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-26_03_B5203; source_row=22515
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Ability to pay combined proffered wages of multiple beneficiaries

Why AAO was not persuaded

USCIS records show the Petitioner filed multiple I-140 petitions. The Petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay the combined proffered wages of this and other applicable petitions, but failed to provide the required documentation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
USCIS records show the Petitioner filed multiple I-140 petitions. The Petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay the combined proffered wages of this and other applicable petitions, but failed to provide the required documentation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-26_03_B5203; source_row=22514
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Successor in interest / labor certification validity

Why AAO was not persuaded

The bill of sale did not specify assets acquired, and the record failed to establish the company's acquisition of the rights and obligations necessary to continue the Petitioner's business, or that the job opportunity was unchanged, or that the successor could pay the proffered wage.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The bill of sale did not specify assets acquired, and the record failed to establish the company's acquisition of the rights and obligations necessary to continue the Petitioner's business, or that the job opportunity was unchanged, or that the successor could pay the proffered wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-26_03_B5203; source_row=22517
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Net income and net current assets

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner's tax returns for 2014 and 2015 reflect negative net income and negative net current assets, which do not demonstrate ability to pay the shortfall in either year.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's tax returns for 2014 and 2015 reflect negative net income and negative net current assets, which do not demonstrate ability to pay the shortfall in either year.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-26_03_B5203; source_row=22509
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment