Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 15991–16000
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the submitted articles were not about the Petitioner (they discussed cars, racing teams, or car tours), one article was incomplete and lacked an author, and the evidence did not establish that the publications qualified as major trade publications or major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the submitted articles were not about the Petitioner (they discussed cars, racing teams, or car tours), one article was incomplete and lacked an author, and the evidence did not establish that the publications qualified as major trade publications or major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-13_01_B2203; source_row=22452 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the submitted press coverage did not demonstrate national or international recognition, the articles did not discuss the awards' level of recognition, and the Petitioner failed to show that comparable evidence was warranted because he did not demonstrate the criterion does not readily apply to his occupation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the submitted press coverage did not demonstrate national or international recognition, the articles did not discuss the awards' level of recognition, and the Petitioner failed to show that comparable evidence was warranted because he did not demonstrate the criterion does not readily apply to his occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-13_01_B2203; source_row=22450 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that completing specialized technical training does not constitute membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner failed to show the criterion does not readily apply to his occupation or that the evidence is comparable to the regulation's requirements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that completing specialized technical training does not constitute membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner failed to show the criterion does not readily apply to his occupation or that the evidence is comparable to the regulation's requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-13_01_B2203; source_row=22451 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner's contributions mainly affected one company's luxury car sales in Brazil rather than the broader field, and that racing victories did not establish an original contribution of major significance in the sport or auto industry.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director, finding that the Petitioner's contributions mainly affected one company's luxury car sales in Brazil rather than the broader field, and that racing victories did not establish an original contribution of major significance in the sport or auto industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-13_01_B2203; source_row=22453 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found substantial merit in the Petitioner's teaching work but concluded that the prospective impact of his individual classroom activities did not rise to national importance. Contributing to a national educational goal collectively does not make the work of a single teacher nationally important under Dhanasar, and the record lacked evidence that the Petitioner's work would reach beyond his school or district to affect…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found substantial merit in the Petitioner's teaching work but concluded that the prospective impact of his individual classroom activities did not rise to national importance. Contributing to a national educational goal collectively does not make the work of a single teacher nationally important under Dhanasar, and the record lacked evidence that the Petitioner's work would reach beyond his school or district to affect his region or the nation more broadly.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-13_01_B5203; source_row=22456 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's role as lead mechanic for a racing team was a critical role, supported by the technical director's letter describing his specific responsibilities and key contributions, and that the team had a distinguished reputation as demonstrated by various articles.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's role as lead mechanic for a racing team was a critical role, supported by the technical director's letter describing his specific responsibilities and key contributions, and that the team had a distinguished reputation as demonstrated by various articles.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-13_01_B2203; source_row=22454 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO had previously found in its appellate decision that the Petitioner met the second prong, as he provided evidence that he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor of increasing his students' English language proficiency.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO had previously found in its appellate decision that the Petitioner met the second prong, as he provided evidence that he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor of increasing his students' English language proficiency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-13_01_B5203; source_row=22457 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved the third prong, declining to address the balancing factors because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly reserved the third prong, declining to address the balancing factors because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-13_01_B5203; source_row=22458 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Wages paid to the Beneficiary were below the proffered wage in every year 2010-2016, and net income/net current assets did not cover the shortfall in 2010, 2011, and 2015. The Petitioner failed to address the combined proffered wages of beneficiaries of at least 15 other petitions, and the totality of circumstances did not support continuing ability to pay.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Wages paid to the Beneficiary were below the proffered wage in every year 2010-2016, and net income/net current assets did not cover the shortfall in 2010, 2011, and 2015. The Petitioner failed to address the combined proffered wages of beneficiaries of at least 15 other petitions, and the totality of circumstances did not support continuing ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-13_02_B5203; source_row=22459 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Beneficiary's visa interview statement that he would visit a cousin who owns hotels in Michigan contradicts the 'No' response to Part C.9 of the labor certification, raising a bona fide job offer concern that must be resolved on remand.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary's visa interview statement that he would visit a cousin who owns hotels in Michigan contradicts the 'No' response to Part C.9 of the labor certification, raising a bona fide job offer concern that must be resolved on remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-09_01_B5203; source_row=22449 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c