Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16001–16010
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found substantial merit in the petitioner's proposed engineering simulation services work, but found he had not demonstrated that the proposed endeavor's prospective impact extended beyond his company and its potential clients. His assertions about future contracts with large agencies were unsupported, and his plan to hire one additional employee did not demonstrate significant national economic impact.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found substantial merit in the petitioner's proposed engineering simulation services work, but found he had not demonstrated that the proposed endeavor's prospective impact extended beyond his company and its potential clients. His assertions about future contracts with large agencies were unsupported, and his plan to hire one additional employee did not demonstrate significant national economic impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-08_01_B5203; source_row=22445 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's finding on the second prong, finding that while the petitioner has experience in payload design and simulation software, this past experience does not render him well positioned to advance a proposed engineering simulations business.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding on the second prong, finding that while the petitioner has experience in payload design and simulation software, this past experience does not render him well positioned to advance a proposed engineering simulations business. The evidence of customer interest was insufficient, and his track record of running a business, business plan, and progress toward goals did not rise to the required level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-08_01_B5203; source_row=22446 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the petitioner had not established the first two prongs of the Dhanasar framework, making further discussion of the balancing factors unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the petitioner had not established the first two prongs of the Dhanasar framework, making further discussion of the balancing factors unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-08_01_B5203; source_row=22447 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the letters did not provide specific probative information about how the Petitioner's role was critical to the organizations as a whole. Individual achievements and general assertions were insufficient. Additionally, neither the national team nor the university team was shown to have a distinguished reputation as required by the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the letters did not provide specific probative information about how the Petitioner's role was critical to the organizations as a whole. Individual achievements and general assertions were insufficient. Additionally, neither the national team nor the university team was shown to have a distinguished reputation as required by the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-06_02_B2203; source_row=22443 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the record lacked sufficient corroborating evidence (such as rosters or statistics) to confirm national team membership, and failed to establish that selectors were recognized national or international experts. Selection appeared based on qualifying times and rankings rather than judging of outstanding achievements by recognized experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record lacked sufficient corroborating evidence (such as rosters or statistics) to confirm national team membership, and failed to establish that selectors were recognized national or international experts. Selection appeared based on qualifying times and rankings rather than judging of outstanding achievements by recognized experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-06_02_B2203; source_row=22441 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO addressed this in the final merits determination, noting that Petitioner did not demonstrate the awards are recognized for excellence in the field, and the record did not document that competitions included accomplished directors from throughout the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO addressed this in the final merits determination, noting that Petitioner did not demonstrate the awards are recognized for excellence in the field, and the record did not document that competitions included accomplished directors from throughout the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-06_01_B2203; source_row=22435 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
The totality of evidence — awards without demonstrated prestige, sparse and dated media coverage, judging of non-prestigious regional competitions two decades ago, unsubstantiated original contributions, and display of work typical for any director — does not show sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The totality of evidence — awards without demonstrated prestige, sparse and dated media coverage, judging of non-prestigious regional competitions two decades ago, unsubstantiated original contributions, and display of work typical for any director — does not show sustained national or international acclaim or placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-03-06_01_B2203; source_row=22439 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c