Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16021–16030
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the totality of evidence — substantial peer review, frequently and consistently cited publications, a co-authored prestigious book chapter, presentations at large international conferences, and numerous expert letters attesting to real-world influence — establishes sustained acclaim and top-of-field status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the totality of evidence — substantial peer review, frequently and consistently cited publications, a co-authored prestigious book chapter, presentations at large international conferences, and numerous expert letters attesting to real-world influence — establishes sustained acclaim and top-of-field status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-28_02_B2203; source_row=22431 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that neither the 2016 net income nor net current assets covered the $128,315 proffered wage; the prorating argument was rejected as a matter of policy; the contractor wages via Forms 1099-MISC were insufficient because the forms did not identify job titles/duties or account for employee benefit costs; and the Petitioner failed to substantiate its claimed gross income or demonstrate a pattern of historical growth s…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that neither the 2016 net income nor net current assets covered the $128,315 proffered wage; the prorating argument was rejected as a matter of policy; the contractor wages via Forms 1099-MISC were insufficient because the forms did not identify job titles/duties or account for employee benefit costs; and the Petitioner failed to substantiate its claimed gross income or demonstrate a pattern of historical growth sufficient for a favorable totality-of-circumstances finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-28_02_B5203; source_row=22432 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner failed to document his actual earnings from his claimed employer, did not resolve the inconsistency as to whether he held a CEO position, and thus could not establish that his compensation was high compared to others in his field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to document his actual earnings from his claimed employer, did not resolve the inconsistency as to whether he held a CEO position, and thus could not establish that his compensation was high compared to others in his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_03_B2203; source_row=22402 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a leading role because his evidence did not show how his roles were leading to the companies at large or where he fit in the overall reporting structure. For a critical role, the evidence did not establish that his contributions were of significant importance to the outcome of the organizations' activities.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate a leading role because his evidence did not show how his roles were leading to the companies at large or where he fit in the overall reporting structure. For a critical role, the evidence did not establish that his contributions were of significant importance to the outcome of the organizations' activities.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_03_B2203; source_row=22401 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The trophies and medals overlap with the awards criterion and were not indicative of original contributions of major significance. Recommendation letters spoke to personal qualities and sportsmanship but did not show that the Petitioner's methods affected others, that he introduced widely-used techniques, or that his work otherwise constituted an original contribution of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The trophies and medals overlap with the awards criterion and were not indicative of original contributions of major significance. Recommendation letters spoke to personal qualities and sportsmanship but did not show that the Petitioner's methods affected others, that he introduced widely-used techniques, or that his work otherwise constituted an original contribution of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_02_B2203; source_row=22395 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding, concluding that coach statements alone were insufficient to establish that the trophies and medals were 'nationally or internationally recognized' prizes or awards, and the Petitioner provided no corroborating documentary evidence of the recognition level of the competitions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding, concluding that coach statements alone were insufficient to establish that the trophies and medals were 'nationally or internationally recognized' prizes or awards, and the Petitioner provided no corroborating documentary evidence of the recognition level of the competitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_02_B2203; source_row=22393 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not show where his role fit within the overall hierarchy of the organization, did not differentiate himself from other players and coaches to demonstrate a leading role, and did not show that his play contributed substantially to the organization's success. Additionally, the record lacked sufficient evidence that the organization had a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not show where his role fit within the overall hierarchy of the organization, did not differentiate himself from other players and coaches to demonstrate a leading role, and did not show that his play contributed substantially to the organization's success. Additionally, the record lacked sufficient evidence that the organization had a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_02_B2203; source_row=22396 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The article did not identify an author, was not about the Petitioner (he was not named in it), and the record did not establish that the publication qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or major media. USCIS need not rely on the publisher's self-promotional material.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The article did not identify an author, was not about the Petitioner (he was not named in it), and the record did not establish that the publication qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or major media. USCIS need not rely on the publisher's self-promotional material.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_02_B2203; source_row=22394 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The evidence did not indicate the membership requirements or demonstrate that they necessitate outstanding achievements, and did not show that membership is judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence did not indicate the membership requirements or demonstrate that they necessitate outstanding achievements, and did not show that membership is judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_06_B2203; source_row=22416 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c