Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 16041–16050

EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established

Case facts

Electrical / Electronic Engineering64 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The scholarship is intended to support students working on projects of interest to electric utilities, not as an award for excellence in the field, and has not demonstrated national or international recognition. The reviewer recognition does not constitute an award recognized beyond the presenting organization.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The scholarship is intended to support students working on projects of interest to electric utilities, not as an award for excellence in the field, and has not demonstrated national or international recognition. The reviewer recognition does not constitute an award recognized beyond the presenting organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=22383
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

Although the Petitioner made original discoveries, the letters did not document the impact of her work on the field, the citation comparison was anecdotal and inapposite, and the record did not demonstrate that her contributions rose to the level of major significance.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner made original discoveries, the letters did not document the impact of her work on the field, the citation comparison was anecdotal and inapposite, and the record did not demonstrate that her contributions rose to the level of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_05_B2203; source_row=22411
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

Why AAO was not persuaded

While the article constituted published material about the Petitioner, the record did not establish that the journal was a professional or major trade publication or other major media, and no corroborating evidence of readership was provided.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
While the article constituted published material about the Petitioner, the record did not establish that the journal was a professional or major trade publication or other major media, and no corroborating evidence of readership was provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_05_B2203; source_row=22409
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership

Why AAO was not persuaded

The record did not contain documentation verifying membership or establishing that the associations require outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized national or international experts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record did not contain documentation verifying membership or establishing that the associations require outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_05_B2203; source_row=22408
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The research grant did not qualify as a nationally or internationally recognized award for excellence. The nomination did not constitute receipt of an award as required by the regulation, and the Petitioner failed to demonstrate why the criterion does not apply to her occupation to justify comparable evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The research grant did not qualify as a nationally or internationally recognized award for excellence. The nomination did not constitute receipt of an award as required by the regulation, and the Petitioner failed to demonstrate why the criterion does not apply to her occupation to justify comparable evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_05_B2203; source_row=22407
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display

Why AAO was not persuaded

An academic journal cover does not represent an artistic showcase or exhibition, and the illustrations did not amount to an artistic display of the Petitioner's work in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
An academic journal cover does not represent an artistic showcase or exhibition, and the illustrations did not amount to an artistic display of the Petitioner's work in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_05_B2203; source_row=22413
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Labor certification minimum requirements support advanced degree professional classification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed that the H.14 phrase 'in lieu of the above stated education and experience requirements' went beyond standard Kellogg language and created an alternative minimum that could be satisfied with less than a single advanced degree or a bachelor's plus five years of progressive experience. The recruitment materials used identical language and did not clarify the requirements.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the H.14 phrase 'in lieu of the above stated education and experience requirements' went beyond standard Kellogg language and created an alternative minimum that could be satisfied with less than a single advanced degree or a bachelor's plus five years of progressive experience. The recruitment materials used identical language and did not clarify the requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_02_B5203; source_row=22398
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

What the decision said

AAO noted the Petitioner previously claimed this criterion but did not continue to do so on appeal, and the record did not support a finding that he meets it; accordingly AAO did not further address it.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted the Petitioner previously claimed this criterion but did not continue to do so on appeal, and the record did not support a finding that he meets it; accordingly AAO did not further address it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_03_B2203; source_row=22400
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the certified translation of the article published in the Hungarian edition of a major medium constituted published material about the Petitioner and established that he meets this criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the certified translation of the article published in the Hungarian edition of a major medium constituted published material about the Petitioner and established that he meets this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_03_B2203; source_row=22399
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO previously found, and reiterated, that the Petitioner is well positioned to serve as the company's CEO under the second prong.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO previously found, and reiterated, that the Petitioner is well positioned to serve as the company's CEO under the second prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-27_01_B5203; source_row=22391
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment