Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16091–16100
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the Petitioner established he held a leading role, the letter attesting to the organization's distinguished reputation was from an author who did not identify the basis of his knowledge, and no additional corroborating evidence established a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner established he held a leading role, the letter attesting to the organization's distinguished reputation was from an author who did not identify the basis of his knowledge, and no additional corroborating evidence established a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-07_01_B2203; source_row=22348 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The articles about the Petitioner concerned his educational history rather than his work in the field; the video program lacked required documentation (transcript, date, author, evidence of qualifying medium); the journal article lacked evidence the publication was a professional or major trade publication; the newspaper article lacked a full English translation and corroborative evidence of major media status; appeal-stage…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The articles about the Petitioner concerned his educational history rather than his work in the field; the video program lacked required documentation (transcript, date, author, evidence of qualifying medium); the journal article lacked evidence the publication was a professional or major trade publication; the newspaper article lacked a full English translation and corroborative evidence of major media status; appeal-stage articles were mostly post-filing, lacked certified translations, and lacked author information.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-07_01_B2203; source_row=22344 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not provide documentation of how often his articles are cited or other evidence showing how his work affected the field. Articles referencing his work noted the number of papers and prescriptions but did not demonstrate major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not provide documentation of how often his articles are cited or other evidence showing how his work affected the field. Articles referencing his work noted the number of papers and prescriptions but did not demonstrate major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-07_01_B2203; source_row=22346 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner failed to establish membership in the national team. Even if membership were shown, mere membership in a national team does not in itself demonstrate a critical role; the Petitioner must show his performance was essential to the team's success. No competitions with the team were identified, no specific role was described, and the team's distinguished reputation was not established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner failed to establish membership in the national team. Even if membership were shown, mere membership in a national team does not in itself demonstrate a critical role; the Petitioner must show his performance was essential to the team's success. No competitions with the team were identified, no specific role was described, and the team's distinguished reputation was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-05_01_B2203; source_row=22342 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The evidence showed the Petitioner was a candidate or qualified for membership but did not establish actual membership. Even if membership were established, no documentation showed the organization requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence showed the Petitioner was a candidate or qualified for membership but did not establish actual membership. Even if membership were established, no documentation showed the organization requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-05_01_B2203; source_row=22339 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The submitted screenshot was about a team competing at a tournament and only mentioned the Petitioner once; it was not published material about the Petitioner. Additionally, the author was not included and the website was not shown to be a professional or major trade publication or major medium.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted screenshot was about a team competing at a tournament and only mentioned the Petitioner once; it was not published material about the Petitioner. Additionally, the author was not included and the website was not shown to be a professional or major trade publication or major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-05_01_B2203; source_row=22340 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The evidence showed the Petitioner served as a 'referee' rather than a 'judge.' No evidence was provided that a referee's duties involve evaluating or judging the work of competitors as opposed to enforcing rules, and no documentation showed that serving as a referee equates to judging the work of others.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The evidence showed the Petitioner served as a 'referee' rather than a 'judge.' No evidence was provided that a referee's duties involve evaluating or judging the work of competitors as opposed to enforcing rules, and no documentation showed that serving as a referee equates to judging the work of others.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-05_01_B2203; source_row=22341 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record shows the Petitioner received two third-place finishes in a recognized competition. AAO concurred with the Director's finding that this criterion was satisfied.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record shows the Petitioner received two third-place finishes in a recognized competition. AAO concurred with the Director's finding that this criterion was satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-02-05_01_B2203; source_row=22338 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c