Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the record sufficiently demonstrated the Petitioner played a critical role for a dance school, based on newspaper articles referencing her as head coach and choreographer, a letter from the school's founder, and governmental proclamations discussing the school's reputation and the Petitioner's contributions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record sufficiently demonstrated the Petitioner played a critical role for a dance school, based on newspaper articles referencing her as head coach and choreographer, a letter from the school's founder, and governmental proclamations discussing the school's reputation and the Petitioner's contributions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-26_02_B2203; source_row=22299 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner failed to submit the required annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements for 2015 or 2016. The available documents—a 2014 tax return, a W-2 showing payment below the proffered wage, and 2016 paychecks—were insufficient to establish ability to pay the $84,906 proffered wage from the priority date onward.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to submit the required annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements for 2015 or 2016. The available documents—a 2014 tax return, a W-2 showing payment below the proffered wage, and 2016 paychecks—were insufficient to establish ability to pay the $84,906 proffered wage from the priority date onward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-26_02_B5203; source_row=22302 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed that the H.14 language—particularly 'any suitable combination of education, training or experience' defined as 'substantial compatibility with stated academic level and job experience requirements'—permits less than an advanced degree, and that routing H.4-B, H.7-A, and H.10-B to H.14 for details made it impossible to identify separate primary and alternate requirements.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the H.14 language—particularly 'any suitable combination of education, training or experience' defined as 'substantial compatibility with stated academic level and job experience requirements'—permits less than an advanced degree, and that routing H.4-B, H.7-A, and H.10-B to H.14 for details made it impossible to identify separate primary and alternate requirements. The Petitioner's reliance on Matter of Agma Systems was misplaced because the issue was whether the additional language lowered minimum requirements, not whether Kellogg language should have been included.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-26_02_B5203; source_row=22301 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record lacked required financial documentation for 2016 (the priority date year), and the Petitioner did not demonstrate ability to pay the combined proffered wages across at least 11 other pending or subsequently filed petitions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked required financial documentation for 2016 (the priority date year), and the Petitioner did not demonstrate ability to pay the combined proffered wages across at least 11 other pending or subsequently filed petitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-26_01_B5203; source_row=22293 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years of post-baccalaureate experience by priority date
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the Director's conclusion. While AAO's own precedent in Matter of O-A- allows pre-diploma experience to count when a provisional certificate or equivalent evidence establishes degree completion, the Petitioner here provided no such evidence and did not explain the nearly nine-year gap between the claimed 2003 completion and the 2012 diploma issuance.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director's conclusion. While AAO's own precedent in Matter of O-A- allows pre-diploma experience to count when a provisional certificate or equivalent evidence establishes degree completion, the Petitioner here provided no such evidence and did not explain the nearly nine-year gap between the claimed 2003 completion and the 2012 diploma issuance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-26_01_B5203; source_row=22292 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not show that performing in one show out of 12 touring productions constituted a leading or critical role for the overall organization. Letters confirmed contributions to specific shows but did not establish influence over the organization's overall reputation or success.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not show that performing in one show out of 12 touring productions constituted a leading or critical role for the overall organization. Letters confirmed contributions to specific shows but did not establish influence over the organization's overall reputation or success.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_02_B2203; source_row=22275 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
Most submitted articles and screenshots were about the productions rather than about the Petitioner himself. Website screenshots that were about the Petitioner lacked evidence establishing the sites as major media. Television segment screenshots lacked required transcripts/recordings and did not include title, date, and author.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Most submitted articles and screenshots were about the productions rather than about the Petitioner himself. Website screenshots that were about the Petitioner lacked evidence establishing the sites as major media. Television segment screenshots lacked required transcripts/recordings and did not include title, date, and author.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_02_B2203; source_row=22273 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
Why AAO was not persuaded
The W-2 comparators were too limited and specific; the letter attested the Petitioner 'can' command high salary rather than demonstrating he actually does; evidence showing top 10% at his employer did not establish standing in the broader field; and DOL wage data for broad categories did not represent an appropriate comparator group.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The W-2 comparators were too limited and specific; the letter attested the Petitioner 'can' command high salary rather than demonstrating he actually does; evidence showing top 10% at his employer did not establish standing in the broader field; and DOL wage data for broad categories did not represent an appropriate comparator group.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_02_B2203; source_row=22276 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
one-time major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the record insufficient to support the claim of a major internationally recognized award because, while the awards are recognized in Canada, the Petitioner did not demonstrate they are recognized internationally.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record insufficient to support the claim of a major internationally recognized award because, while the awards are recognized in Canada, the Petitioner did not demonstrate they are recognized internationally.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-25_03_B2203; source_row=22278 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c