Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 1611–1620
NIWNIW · National importanceNot established
Case facts
Finance
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence did not demonstrate that her endeavor extends beyond her own business and future clients to impact the broader field, other industries, or the U.S. economy at a level commensurate with national importance. The new articles submitted on motion were general and did not address the specifics of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence did not demonstrate that her endeavor extends beyond her own business and future clients to impact the broader field, other industries, or the U.S. economy at a level commensurate with national importance. The new articles submitted on motion were general and did not address the specifics of the Petitioner's proposed endeavor. The concept of 'national initiative' does not appear in Dhanasar, and the Petitioner's arguments regarding standard of proof were conclusory.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-21_08_B5203; source_row=42774 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held that while the articles may show the general importance of consulting services, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his specific endeavor meets the national importance element of the first Dhanasar prong.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that while the articles may show the general importance of consulting services, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate that his specific endeavor meets the national importance element of the first Dhanasar prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-21_07_B5203; source_row=42771 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Without a properly translated academic record, his education cannot support the claim. He has not completed his doctorate (pursued since 2016) yet seeks a postdoctoral position, has no evidence of interest from the University of South Carolina or other institutions, and no evidence of research funding or progress.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Without a properly translated academic record, his education cannot support the claim. He has not completed his doctorate (pursued since 2016) yet seeks a postdoctoral position, has no evidence of interest from the University of South Carolina or other institutions, and no evidence of research funding or progress.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-21_10_B5203; source_row=42779 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The translator certification did not affirm competence to translate from the foreign language into English, so the foreign-degree evidence does not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The translator certification did not affirm competence to translate from the foreign language into English, so the foreign-degree evidence does not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-21_10_B5203; source_row=42777 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
member of professions holding an advanced degree or equivalent
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagrees with the Director, finding the Petitioner's first foreign bachelor's required only three-and-a-half years and is not equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's, and that her second bachelor's was too recent to provide the required five years of post-degree progressive experience by the petition filing date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagrees with the Director, finding the Petitioner's first foreign bachelor's required only three-and-a-half years and is not equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's, and that her second bachelor's was too recent to provide the required five years of post-degree progressive experience by the petition filing date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-21_06_B5203; source_row=42770 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
bachelor's degree plus five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO finds the experience letters lack required specificity, that colleague letters do not substitute for employer letters, and that inconsistencies further undermine the evidence. No new facts on motion overcome these defects.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the experience letters lack required specificity, that colleague letters do not substitute for employer letters, and that inconsistencies further undermine the evidence. No new facts on motion overcome these defects.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-21_05_B5203; source_row=42765 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The submitted articles describe the legal industry, foreign investment, and Brazilian markets at a generalized level without tying any U.S. economic impact or job creation specifically to the Petitioner's endeavor. Her business plan lacks independent corroboration of staffing or financial projections.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The submitted articles describe the legal industry, foreign investment, and Brazilian markets at a generalized level without tying any U.S. economic impact or job creation specifically to the Petitioner's endeavor. Her business plan lacks independent corroboration of staffing or financial projections.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-21_05_B5203; source_row=42762 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second Dhanasar prong, reserving it as unnecessary to the outcome given the dispositive finding on the first prong.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second Dhanasar prong, reserving it as unnecessary to the outcome given the dispositive finding on the first prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-21_01_B5203; source_row=42746 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c