Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16211–16220
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
The 2006 article was about 25 luxury services rather than about the Beneficiary; other articles lacked identified authors or were instructional rather than about him; petitioner did not establish the publications or TV station qualified as professional/major trade publications or major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 2006 article was about 25 luxury services rather than about the Beneficiary; other articles lacked identified authors or were instructional rather than about him; petitioner did not establish the publications or TV station qualified as professional/major trade publications or major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-17_01_B2203; source_row=22210 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
The casting director letter was not accompanied by published photographs or other proof of display; the article is published material, not display; the stylized photograph was not tied to an identified exhibition or showcase. AAO also rejected reliance on the prior service center decision.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The casting director letter was not accompanied by published photographs or other proof of display; the article is published material, not display; the stylized photograph was not tied to an identified exhibition or showcase. AAO also rejected reliance on the prior service center decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-17_01_B2203; source_row=22212 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner submitted no new evidence on prong 3 in the motion to reopen, and on motion to reconsider did not provide sufficient explanation to show AAO's prior determination was erroneous.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner submitted no new evidence on prong 3 in the motion to reopen, and on motion to reconsider did not provide sufficient explanation to show AAO's prior determination was erroneous.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-17_01_B5203; source_row=22217 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner did not contest the Director's analysis of the reference letters, and did not show that the criterion does not readily apply to artistic directors/colorists/hair stylists, so comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4) is unavailable; the proffered evidence is also not of the same caliber.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not contest the Director's analysis of the reference letters, and did not show that the criterion does not readily apply to artistic directors/colorists/hair stylists, so comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4) is unavailable; the proffered evidence is also not of the same caliber.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-17_01_B2203; source_row=22211 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the letter and contract sufficiently demonstrated that the Beneficiary performed in a qualifying leading or critical role, and articles established that the petitioning organization has a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the letter and contract sufficiently demonstrated that the Beneficiary performed in a qualifying leading or critical role, and articles established that the petitioning organization has a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-17_01_B2203; source_row=22213 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that new email evidence confirmed the Petitioner worked to identify the software inconsistency but did not offer additional evidence of contribution or significance. The landfill project report did not explain the Petitioner's role or document that his work was central to stabilizing the facility.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that new email evidence confirmed the Petitioner worked to identify the software inconsistency but did not offer additional evidence of contribution or significance. The landfill project report did not explain the Petitioner's role or document that his work was central to stabilizing the facility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-17_01_B5203; source_row=22216 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO reaffirmed its prior finding that prong 1 is met for the Petitioner's research activities, but limited that finding — teaching activities at a single high school program do not rise to national importance. New evidence of student accomplishments did not show broader impact on the field of environmental health education.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO reaffirmed its prior finding that prong 1 is met for the Petitioner's research activities, but limited that finding — teaching activities at a single high school program do not rise to national importance. New evidence of student accomplishments did not show broader impact on the field of environmental health education.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-17_01_B5203; source_row=22215 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO concluded it was more likely than not that the Beneficiary commanded a salary indicative of exceptional ability, given wages 12-40% above the highest skill level and stock options.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded it was more likely than not that the Beneficiary commanded a salary indicative of exceptional ability, given wages 12-40% above the highest skill level and stock options.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-12_01_B5203; source_row=22205 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
10 years full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the record contained sufficient evidence of the Beneficiary's employment activities in software engineering to satisfy the 10-year full-time experience requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record contained sufficient evidence of the Beneficiary's employment activities in software engineering to satisfy the 10-year full-time experience requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-12_01_B5203; source_row=22204 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c