Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The audited financial statements for 2016-17 reflected negative net income and negative net current assets. The submitted 2016 tax return likewise showed over $6 million in losses. The Director had actually considered both the missing tax return and the audited financial statements, contrary to the Petitioner's characterization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The audited financial statements for 2016-17 reflected negative net income and negative net current assets. The submitted 2016 tax return likewise showed over $6 million in losses. The Director had actually considered both the missing tax return and the audited financial statements, contrary to the Petitioner's characterization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-03_01_B5203; source_row=22195 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Unlike in Sonegawa, the Petitioner has conducted business for less than five years, lacks a history of profits, and did not establish uncharacteristic expenses, an outstanding industry reputation, or that the Beneficiary would replace a current employee. Additionally, the Petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay combined proffered wages for multiple beneficiaries.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Unlike in Sonegawa, the Petitioner has conducted business for less than five years, lacks a history of profits, and did not establish uncharacteristic expenses, an outstanding industry reputation, or that the Beneficiary would replace a current employee. Additionally, the Petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay combined proffered wages for multiple beneficiaries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-03_01_B5203; source_row=22196 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Ability to pay combined proffered wages of multiple approved petitions
Why AAO was not persuaded
USCIS records show the Petitioner filed three petitions for other beneficiaries that remained approved after this petition's priority date. A petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay the combined proffered wages of all such petitions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
USCIS records show the Petitioner filed three petitions for other beneficiaries that remained approved after this petition's priority date. A petitioner must demonstrate ability to pay the combined proffered wages of all such petitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-03_01_B5203; source_row=22197 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record lacked the academic credentials evaluation required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(A) to establish that any of the foreign degrees are equivalent to a U.S. master's or doctorate, and the U.S. program was incomplete.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked the academic credentials evaluation required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(A) to establish that any of the foreign degrees are equivalent to a U.S. master's or doctorate, and the U.S. program was incomplete.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-02_01_B5203; source_row=22190 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life SciencesManager
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner offered no evidence on whether a labor certification would be impractical, whether the U.S. would benefit even if qualified workers exist, or whether urgency warrants foregoing the labor certification process; further discussion was unnecessary given the prong 2 failure.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner offered no evidence on whether a labor certification would be impractical, whether the U.S. would benefit even if qualified workers exist, or whether urgency warrants foregoing the labor certification process; further discussion was unnecessary given the prong 2 failure.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-02_01_B5203; source_row=22193 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life SciencesManager
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
Support letters attest to respect from peers but do not explain the Petitioner's specific contributions, the influence of her work, or interest from relevant parties; her authored and self-published works lack documentation of significance, implementation, or reception.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Support letters attest to respect from peers but do not explain the Petitioner's specific contributions, the influence of her work, or interest from relevant parties; her authored and self-published works lack documentation of significance, implementation, or reception.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-02_01_B5203; source_row=22192 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life SciencesManager
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the proposed integrative cancer research and biomedical device development have both substantial merit and national importance based on articles documenting the need for alternative cancer treatments and the broader implications of such research, while limiting the analysis to the research (not the CEO role or medical facility plans).
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the proposed integrative cancer research and biomedical device development have both substantial merit and national importance based on articles documenting the need for alternative cancer treatments and the broader implications of such research, while limiting the analysis to the research (not the CEO role or medical facility plans).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2018-01-02_01_B5203; source_row=22191 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the Petitioner's net income for 2013–2015 appeared sufficient to cover the difference between wages paid and the proffered wage, the Petitioner had multiple pending I-140 petitions and was required to demonstrate combined ability to pay for all of them.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner's net income for 2013–2015 appeared sufficient to cover the difference between wages paid and the proffered wage, the Petitioner had multiple pending I-140 petitions and was required to demonstrate combined ability to pay for all of them. Its RFE response was incomplete—omitting petitions that were denied, revoked, withdrawn, or filed before 2013—making it impossible to accurately assess the Petitioner's total wage burden. The Petitioner's 2017 payment and totality-of-circumstances arguments were also rejected.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-12-28_01_B5203; source_row=22189 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not provide an organizational chart or documentation differentiating her from other faculty, did not show her course instruction contributed to the college's success or standing in a substantial way, and did not sufficiently demonstrate the college has a distinguished reputation relative to other institutions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not provide an organizational chart or documentation differentiating her from other faculty, did not show her course instruction contributed to the college's success or standing in a substantial way, and did not sufficiently demonstrate the college has a distinguished reputation relative to other institutions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-12-22_02_B2203; source_row=22186 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's annualized salary of $64,863 is substantially below the maximum step pay at her own college and is limited to faculty at that college, so it does not show a high salary relative to others in the field. AAO noted the Director's typographical error but found the underlying analysis sound.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's annualized salary of $64,863 is substantially below the maximum step pay at her own college and is limited to faculty at that college, so it does not show a high salary relative to others in the field. AAO noted the Director's typographical error but found the underlying analysis sound.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-12-22_02_B2203; source_row=22187 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c