Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
PhysicsPhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner developed novel platforms for control systems widely utilized in research and commercial sectors, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner developed novel platforms for control systems widely utilized in research and commercial sectors, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-28_01_B2203; source_row=22101 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
PhysicsPhD
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO weighed the totality of the evidence and concluded that the Petitioner has sustained national/international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO weighed the totality of the evidence and concluded that the Petitioner has sustained national/international acclaim and is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-28_01_B2203; source_row=22103 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary holds a qualifying bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO held that the certificate language 'qualified for the Degree,' read together with the four years of transcripts and the 2017 letter from the college principal confirming that the language means the degree was earned, demonstrated that the degree was awarded. AAO also found the foreign degree equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's in engineering.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that the certificate language 'qualified for the Degree,' read together with the four years of transcripts and the 2017 letter from the college principal confirming that the language means the degree was earned, demonstrated that the degree was awarded. AAO also found the foreign degree equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's in engineering.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-27_01_B5203; source_row=22098 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences17 papers17 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that approximately 17 citations across 17 publications (highest-cited with 5 citations) did not demonstrate major significance, conference presentations did not establish major significance, and the recommendation letters were largely prospective and conclusory rather than demonstrating actual impact on the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that approximately 17 citations across 17 publications (highest-cited with 5 citations) did not demonstrate major significance, conference presentations did not establish major significance, and the recommendation letters were largely prospective and conclusory rather than demonstrating actual impact on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-24_01_B2203; source_row=22093 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences17 papers17 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that while the letters confirmed the importance of the Petitioner's contributions to research teams, they did not establish that he performed in a critical role for the organization as a whole, and his postdoctoral fellow duties were not shown to be critical to the greater organization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that while the letters confirmed the importance of the Petitioner's contributions to research teams, they did not establish that he performed in a critical role for the organization as a whole, and his postdoctoral fellow duties were not shown to be critical to the greater organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-24_01_B2203; source_row=22095 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found that the reputation or scope of the awarding entities is not the determining factor; the Petitioner must show the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. None of the submitted awards met this standard.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the reputation or scope of the awarding entities is not the determining factor; the Petitioner must show the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. None of the submitted awards met this standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-24_01_B2203; source_row=22091 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agrees the record fails to demonstrate ability to pay in 2016, but notes the required regulatory documentation (tax returns, audited financials, or annual report) was unavailable at the time of the RFE response and should be obtainable now, warranting remand.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the record fails to demonstrate ability to pay in 2016, but notes the required regulatory documentation (tax returns, audited financials, or annual report) was unavailable at the time of the RFE response and should be obtainable now, warranting remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-24_01_B5203; source_row=22097 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c