Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found that the Petitioner's 2016 W-2 wages to the Beneficiary fell short of the proffered wage, and required regulatory evidence for 2016 was not submitted on appeal. Additionally, the Petitioner had filed at least 22 other petitions whose combined proffered wages it must also demonstrate ability to pay.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's 2016 W-2 wages to the Beneficiary fell short of the proffered wage, and required regulatory evidence for 2016 was not submitted on appeal. Additionally, the Petitioner had filed at least 22 other petitions whose combined proffered wages it must also demonstrate ability to pay. Under the Sonegawa totality analysis, the Petitioner's approximately four-year history, $740.6 million in accumulated losses, and obligation to pay multiple beneficiaries precluded a finding of ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-22_01_B5203; source_row=22089 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary possesses minimum required experience per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The company letter did not describe the Beneficiary's experience or his work with the required technologies. The supervisor's letter was on personal stationery without proof of his former affiliation with the company, and no showing was made that a proper employer letter was unavailable, so it could not be accepted as secondary evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The company letter did not describe the Beneficiary's experience or his work with the required technologies. The supervisor's letter was on personal stationery without proof of his former affiliation with the company, and no showing was made that a proper employer letter was unavailable, so it could not be accepted as secondary evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-22_01_B5203; source_row=22090 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner's judging history was limited, his citation record did not demonstrate sustained acclaim, his critical role within his company did not translate to top-of-field recognition, and letters about his contributions lacked independent attribution and impact evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's judging history was limited, his citation record did not demonstrate sustained acclaim, his critical role within his company did not translate to top-of-field recognition, and letters about his contributions lacked independent attribution and impact evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=22070 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI12 papers1,981 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that letters from end users were of limited probative value because research contributions in the industry are attributed to the company rather than individuals, and the record did not establish how the Petitioner's contributions were directly attributable to him as opposed to other developers.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that letters from end users were of limited probative value because research contributions in the industry are attributed to the company rather than individuals, and the record did not establish how the Petitioner's contributions were directly attributable to him as opposed to other developers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B2203; source_row=22067 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions in more than one country (20 C.F.R. § 656.15(d)(1)(vii))
Why the evidence was persuasive
The Beneficiary displayed his creative works at artistic exhibitions in several countries including the US, Netherlands, Ireland, Italy, and France, meeting the multi-country display criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary displayed his creative works at artistic exhibitions in several countries including the US, Netherlands, Ireland, Italy, and France, meeting the multi-country display criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=22078 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and contributions from peers/professional organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record contains letters from peers, mentors, employers, and professional art administrators recognizing the significance of the Beneficiary's achievements and contributions, and his work has been displayed at international venues in Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, and New York.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contains letters from peers, mentors, employers, and professional art administrators recognizing the significance of the Beneficiary's achievements and contributions, and his work has been displayed at international venues in Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, and New York.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=22073 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
10 years full-time experience in the occupation
Why the evidence was persuasive
Despite the Director's concerns that employer letters used similar language mirroring the labor certification, AAO found the record taken as a whole contains sufficient evidence of the Beneficiary's activities as a fine artist over many years to meet the 10-year experience requirement for the exceptional ability criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Despite the Director's concerns that employer letters used similar language mirroring the labor certification, AAO found the record taken as a whole contains sufficient evidence of the Beneficiary's activities as a fine artist over many years to meet the 10-year experience requirement for the exceptional ability criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=22072 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence (20 C.F.R. § 656.15(d)(1)(i))
Why AAO was not persuaded
The 2015 travel award lacked sufficient documentation to show it is internationally recognized. The Irish government agency awards were national in scope, limited to Irish artists or those working in Ireland, and appeared aimed at furthering Irish cultural life rather than recognizing individual international excellence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The 2015 travel award lacked sufficient documentation to show it is internationally recognized. The Irish government agency awards were national in scope, limited to Irish artists or those working in Ireland, and appeared aimed at furthering Irish cultural life rather than recognizing individual international excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=22075 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
widespread acclaim and international recognition by recognized experts (20 C.F.R. § 656.15(d)(1))
Why the evidence was persuasive
The letters from contemporary art experts, supported by contemporaneous evidence including gallery announcements, press releases, and trade magazine advertisements, established that the Beneficiary has garnered widespread international acclaim for his work as a fine artist and creator of contemporary art installations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters from contemporary art experts, supported by contemporaneous evidence including gallery announcements, press releases, and trade magazine advertisements, established that the Beneficiary has garnered widespread international acclaim for his work as a fine artist and creator of contemporary art installations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=22079 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material in professional publications about the alien (20 C.F.R. § 656.15(d)(1)(iii))
Why the evidence was persuasive
At least two submitted articles about the Beneficiary appeared in professional publications meeting the regulatory requirements and focused on his work in the field: a 2009 article in a contemporary visual culture periodical and a 2001 article in a publication reporting on design trends.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
At least two submitted articles about the Beneficiary appeared in professional publications meeting the regulatory requirements and focused on his work in the field: a 2009 article in a contemporary visual culture periodical and a 2001 article in a publication reporting on design trends.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-21_01_B5203; source_row=22077 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c