Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16421–16430
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Awards
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
While the new letter sufficed to demonstrate the Petitioner's receipt of the prize, he did not provide additional evidence regarding the pool of competitors or the level of attention the prize attracted, and thus did not establish that the award was nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the new letter sufficed to demonstrate the Petitioner's receipt of the prize, he did not provide additional evidence regarding the pool of competitors or the level of attention the prize attracted, and thus did not establish that the award was nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-06_01_B2203; source_row=21987 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the record insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field status, although a formal final merits determination was unnecessary given the failure at step 1.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record insufficient to establish sustained national or international acclaim or top-of-field status, although a formal final merits determination was unnecessary given the failure at step 1.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-06_01_B2203; source_row=21993 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the articles were about the performances rather than about the Petitioner, the sources were not shown to be professional or major trade publications or major media, and the Petitioner did not identify the date and author for each piece.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the articles were about the performances rather than about the Petitioner, the sources were not shown to be professional or major trade publications or major media, and the Petitioner did not identify the date and author for each piece.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-06_01_B2203; source_row=21988 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's W-2s only exceeded the proffered wage in 2012; Form 990 balance sheets do not isolate net current assets; and net income/revenue was insufficient to demonstrate ability to pay.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's W-2s only exceeded the proffered wage in 2012; Form 990 balance sheets do not isolate net current assets; and net income/revenue was insufficient to demonstrate ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-03_01_B5203; source_row=21985 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not submit required documentation such as Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, IRS determination letter, list of officers and directors, or evidence that any transfer complied with federal law governing public benefit corporations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not submit required documentation such as Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, IRS determination letter, list of officers and directors, or evidence that any transfer complied with federal law governing public benefit corporations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-03_01_B5203; source_row=21986 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Physics
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO finds the work has substantial merit as valuable educational benefit to students but fails national importance because evidence shows only local-level impact at her school/district, not broader influence on STEM education.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the work has substantial merit as valuable educational benefit to students but fails national importance because evidence shows only local-level impact at her school/district, not broader influence on STEM education.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-02_01_B5203; source_row=21978 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Physics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
Based on Petitioner's credentials, awards, recommendation letters, and student outcomes, AAO finds she is well positioned to advance her endeavor of increasing her students' STEM achievement.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Based on Petitioner's credentials, awards, recommendation letters, and student outcomes, AAO finds she is well positioned to advance her endeavor of increasing her students' STEM achievement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-02_01_B5203; source_row=21979 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Bona fides of job offer / genuine need for position
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner had only five employees, paid salaries and wages of $32,706, paid $56,419 in contractor services, and had an advertising budget of $57,153 in 2011. These figures do not support the need for a full-time marketing director at a salary of $142,300.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner had only five employees, paid salaries and wages of $32,706, paid $56,419 in contractor services, and had an advertising budget of $57,153 in 2011. These figures do not support the need for a full-time marketing director at a salary of $142,300.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-11-02_02_B5203; source_row=21983 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c