Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 16491–16500

EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalPhysician45 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that for most associations the Petitioner failed to provide membership requirements, and for those where requirements were provided, they did not reflect outstanding achievements as a condition of eligibility or the use of nationally or internationally recognized experts to judge prospective members. General reputation of an association cannot be presumed to imply exclusive membership requirements.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that for most associations the Petitioner failed to provide membership requirements, and for those where requirements were provided, they did not reflect outstanding achievements as a condition of eligibility or the use of nationally or internationally recognized experts to judge prospective members. General reputation of an association cannot be presumed to imply exclusive membership requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-17_02_B2203; source_row=21907
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot established

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalPhysician45 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

Though not required to conduct a final merits determination given failure at step 1, AAO reviewed the aggregate record and found it did not demonstrate the Beneficiary is in the small percentage at the top of the field or that he has sustained national or international acclaim.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Though not required to conduct a final merits determination given failure at step 1, AAO reviewed the aggregate record and found it did not demonstrate the Beneficiary is in the small percentage at the top of the field or that he has sustained national or international acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-17_02_B2203; source_row=21914
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalPhysician45 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that expert letters lacked specificity about widespread implementation of the Beneficiary's techniques, citation counts were not shown to be high relative to others in the field, and the record lacked documentary evidence of widespread implementation or seminal impact. Participation in conferences alone does not demonstrate original contributions of major significance.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that expert letters lacked specificity about widespread implementation of the Beneficiary's techniques, citation counts were not shown to be high relative to others in the field, and the record lacked documentary evidence of widespread implementation or seminal impact. Participation in conferences alone does not demonstrate original contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-17_02_B2203; source_row=21910
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot established

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalPhysician45 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high remuneration

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that earning approximately 17% above the FLC average wage for doctors does not demonstrate that the Beneficiary commanded a high salary in relation to other surgeons.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that earning approximately 17% above the FLC average wage for doctors does not demonstrate that the Beneficiary commanded a high salary in relation to other surgeons.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-17_02_B2203; source_row=21913
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalPhysician45 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the Petitioner had not presented sufficient evidence that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. Endorsement of the conference by professional organizations is insufficient to establish that the award itself is nationally or internationally recognized, and the awards are limited to students and young practitioners rather than recognized experts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner had not presented sufficient evidence that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field. Endorsement of the conference by professional organizations is insufficient to establish that the award itself is nationally or internationally recognized, and the awards are limited to students and young practitioners rather than recognized experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-17_02_B2203; source_row=21906
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

Why AAO was not persuaded

The supervisor's letter shows the Petitioner supported research projects and completed tasks efficiently, but does not establish significant impact on the office beyond its need for interns. An extended term as volunteer speaks to quality of work, not to a critical role.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The supervisor's letter shows the Petitioner supported research projects and completed tasks efficiently, but does not establish significant impact on the office beyond its need for interns. An extended term as volunteer speaks to quality of work, not to a critical role.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-17_03_B2203; source_row=21916
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

The fellowship was awarded six years after filing and cannot establish eligibility at time of filing; alternatively, the record does not show the organization requires outstanding achievements of members judged by recognized national or international experts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The fellowship was awarded six years after filing and cannot establish eligibility at time of filing; alternatively, the record does not show the organization requires outstanding achievements of members judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-17_03_B2203; source_row=21915
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's service as a manuscript reviewer satisfies the judging criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's service as a manuscript reviewer satisfies the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-17_04_B2203; source_row=21917
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO agreed that the Petitioner's authorship of several scholarly articles in professional publications satisfies this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner's authorship of several scholarly articles in professional publications satisfies this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-17_04_B2203; source_row=21918
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record establishes that the petitioner frequently sat in leadership roles (Assistant Concertmaster, Associate Concertmaster, and Concertmaster) and continues to fill these critical chairs as temporary vacancies occur. The orchestra has a distinguished reputation as one of the finest in the United States.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The record establishes that the petitioner frequently sat in leadership roles (Assistant Concertmaster, Associate Concertmaster, and Concertmaster) and continues to fill these critical chairs as temporary vacancies occur. The orchestra has a distinguished reputation as one of the finest in the United States.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-17_01_B2203; source_row=21900
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment