Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16521–16530
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The articles are not about the Petitioner; all but one report competition results, and the remaining item is about his father. The record also lacks evidence that the publications qualify as professional, major trade, or other major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The articles are not about the Petitioner; all but one report competition results, and the remaining item is about his father. The record also lacks evidence that the publications qualify as professional, major trade, or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-05_01_B2203; source_row=21874 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO noted a formal final merits determination was unnecessary given failure to meet the threshold criteria count, but reviewed the record in the aggregate and found the Petitioner had not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or that his work set him apart from others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted a formal final merits determination was unnecessary given failure to meet the threshold criteria count, but reviewed the record in the aggregate and found the Petitioner had not demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim or that his work set him apart from others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-05_02_B2203; source_row=21884 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the Director improperly mixed the final-merits analysis into this criterion, AAO independently found that the Petitioner's citation record, recommendation letters, patents, and licensing agreements did not establish contributions of major significance in the field. Citations were modest, letters were conclusory, and commercialization was limited and not shown to have widely influenced the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Although the Director improperly mixed the final-merits analysis into this criterion, AAO independently found that the Petitioner's citation record, recommendation letters, patents, and licensing agreements did not establish contributions of major significance in the field. Citations were modest, letters were conclusory, and commercialization was limited and not shown to have widely influenced the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-05_02_B2203; source_row=21882 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer and labor certification
What the decision said
AAO declined to analyze the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance of her proposed endeavor under prong one, making further discussion of the balancing factors purposeless.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to analyze the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance of her proposed endeavor under prong one, making further discussion of the balancing factors purposeless.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-05_01_B5203; source_row=21880 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the record demonstrates the Petitioner's qualifications as an experienced teacher, her ability to serve special needs students, and her instructional skills. She has provided teaching guidance to colleagues and received praise for her work, and therefore satisfies the second prong.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the record demonstrates the Petitioner's qualifications as an experienced teacher, her ability to serve special needs students, and her instructional skills. She has provided teaching guidance to colleagues and received praise for her work, and therefore satisfies the second prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-05_01_B5203; source_row=21879 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO credited the $55,000 paid to the Beneficiary in 2014, reducing the required net income showing to $29,000, which was exceeded by 2014 net income of $64,462. The 2015 net income of $236,781 exceeded the full $84,000 proffered wage.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO credited the $55,000 paid to the Beneficiary in 2014, reducing the required net income showing to $29,000, which was exceeded by 2014 net income of $64,462. The 2015 net income of $236,781 exceeded the full $84,000 proffered wage.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-05_02_B5203; source_row=21885 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
possession of required bachelor's degree or equivalent
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Beneficiary's academic record shows only approximately two years of university studies (September 1991 to December 1993), but a Venezuelan licientiado requires four to five years per EDGE. The credential evaluation conflicts with the academic record and cannot be credited.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary's academic record shows only approximately two years of university studies (September 1991 to December 1993), but a Venezuelan licientiado requires four to five years per EDGE. The credential evaluation conflicts with the academic record and cannot be credited.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-05_02_B5203; source_row=21886 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record shows the Beneficiary acted as an independent distributor for the Petitioner during at least part of the period he claimed full-time employment with a Venezuelan company, creating an unresolved inconsistency. Counsel's assertion without independent evidence is insufficient to resolve the conflict.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record shows the Beneficiary acted as an independent distributor for the Petitioner during at least part of the period he claimed full-time employment with a Venezuelan company, creating an unresolved inconsistency. Counsel's assertion without independent evidence is insufficient to resolve the conflict.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-10-05_02_B5203; source_row=21887 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c