Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's engagement as a manuscript reviewer for a professional journal on topics related to structural heart disease and interventional cardiology satisfied this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's engagement as a manuscript reviewer for a professional journal on topics related to structural heart disease and interventional cardiology satisfied this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-27_02_B2203; source_row=21844 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Because the Petitioner employs over 100 workers, financial officer statements are an acceptable form of evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). The CFO and CEO statements were corroborated by audited financials and payroll tax returns, and no derogatory information cast doubt on their credibility.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner employs over 100 workers, financial officer statements are an acceptable form of evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). The CFO and CEO statements were corroborated by audited financials and payroll tax returns, and no derogatory information cast doubt on their credibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-26_01_B5203; source_row=21838 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner had not shown her HIV prevention research was frequently cited, served as an impetus for progress in the field, affected clinical practice, or generated substantial positive discourse in the broader medical community. The CDC grants listed a different principal investigator and did not document the Petitioner's specific role or generate documented positive interest from relevant parties.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner had not shown her HIV prevention research was frequently cited, served as an impetus for progress in the field, affected clinical practice, or generated substantial positive discourse in the broader medical community. The CDC grants listed a different principal investigator and did not document the Petitioner's specific role or generate documented positive interest from relevant parties.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-25_01_B5203; source_row=21836 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
What the decision said
Because the Petitioner failed to meet the second prong, AAO declined to engage in further analysis of the third prong, finding it would serve no meaningful purpose.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
Because the Petitioner failed to meet the second prong, AAO declined to engage in further analysis of the third prong, finding it would serve no meaningful purpose.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-25_01_B5203; source_row=21837 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's work in HIV prevention has substantial merit given documented economic value of HIV prevention, and that her findings are disseminated to others in the field through medical conferences making her work of national importance.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's work in HIV prevention has substantial merit given documented economic value of HIV prevention, and that her findings are disseminated to others in the field through medical conferences making her work of national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-25_01_B5203; source_row=21835 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The certification requires education, experience, and passing a multiple-choice exam — not outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The professional association's bylaws show membership is open to any person interested in project management, with no requirement of outstanding achievements judged by experts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The certification requires education, experience, and passing a multiple-choice exam — not outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The professional association's bylaws show membership is open to any person interested in project management, with no requirement of outstanding achievements judged by experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=21820 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's actual salary of $93,492 does not constitute a high salary; the billing rate charged by his employer to clients cannot be treated as his own remuneration. The BLS comparison used computer and information research scientists rather than computer program managers (his actual position), and the job offer letter did not show the offered salary was high relative to other senior software engineers.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's actual salary of $93,492 does not constitute a high salary; the billing rate charged by his employer to clients cannot be treated as his own remuneration. The BLS comparison used computer and information research scientists rather than computer program managers (his actual position), and the job offer letter did not show the offered salary was high relative to other senior software engineers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=21824 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Selection for conference presentation does not by itself show major significance. The Petitioner provided only three citing papers that used his work as background rather than singling it out as particularly important. Recommendation letters were primarily conclusory attestations without specific examples of field-wide impact.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Selection for conference presentation does not by itself show major significance. The Petitioner provided only three citing papers that used his work as background rather than singling it out as particularly important. Recommendation letters were primarily conclusory attestations without specific examples of field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=21821 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO finds the Petitioner's teaching has substantial merit but does not have national importance because the prospective impact is limited to his students, school, or district and does not extend more broadly to the field of ELL or alternative education.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds the Petitioner's teaching has substantial merit but does not have national importance because the prospective impact is limited to his students, school, or district and does not extend more broadly to the field of ELL or alternative education.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-22_02_B5203; source_row=21832 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner authored an article published in conference proceedings, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion. AAO agreed with the Director's determination.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner authored an article published in conference proceedings, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion. AAO agreed with the Director's determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-22_01_B2203; source_row=21822 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c