Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16581–16590
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot established
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO rejected the Petitioner's new argument that teaching experience renders him well positioned, noting that only his proposed research endeavor (not teaching) was found nationally important. AAO also rejected the argument that job interview offers from potential employers demonstrated sufficient interest from relevant parties, finding no evidence those employers were interested in specific notable accomplishments.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO rejected the Petitioner's new argument that teaching experience renders him well positioned, noting that only his proposed research endeavor (not teaching) was found nationally important. AAO also rejected the argument that job interview offers from potential employers demonstrated sufficient interest from relevant parties, finding no evidence those employers were interested in specific notable accomplishments.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-21_03_B5203; source_row=21818 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held the regulation's 'shall' language is mandatory; the Petitioner did not submit the required documentation, did not resolve payroll-record discrepancies, and did not provide information about another pending petition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held the regulation's 'shall' language is mandatory; the Petitioner did not submit the required documentation, did not resolve payroll-record discrepancies, and did not provide information about another pending petition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-21_02_B5203; source_row=21815 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO sua sponte identified bona-fides concerns based on public records showing the Beneficiary lives in a condominium owned by the Petitioner's CEO, combined with the small workforce size, and required additional labor-certification evidence in future filings.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO sua sponte identified bona-fides concerns based on public records showing the Beneficiary lives in a condominium owned by the Petitioner's CEO, combined with the small workforce size, and required additional labor-certification evidence in future filings.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-21_02_B5203; source_row=21816 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO had already found in the prior appeal decision that the Petitioner's proposed research into failure mechanisms of infrastructure systems has substantial merit and national importance. This prong was not contested on motion.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO had already found in the prior appeal decision that the Petitioner's proposed research into failure mechanisms of infrastructure systems has substantial merit and national importance. This prong was not contested on motion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-21_03_B5203; source_row=21817 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary's degree in required field per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Beneficiary's diploma, transcripts, and certificate of course completion all reflect a degree in computer science, not computer information systems. The evaluations claiming the degree is equivalent to computer information systems were contradicted by prior evaluations the same Petitioner submitted in earlier proceedings.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Beneficiary's diploma, transcripts, and certificate of course completion all reflect a degree in computer science, not computer information systems. The evaluations claiming the degree is equivalent to computer information systems were contradicted by prior evaluations the same Petitioner submitted in earlier proceedings. Even if accepted, the record did not establish that computer science or computer information systems is a field related to business administration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-21_01_B5203; source_row=21814 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI14 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that publications and presentations alone are insufficient under criterion (v) absent evidence of major significance. The citation evidence showed modest citation counts, and the cited works used the Petitioner's findings only as background information rather than singling them out as particularly important.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that publications and presentations alone are insufficient under criterion (v) absent evidence of major significance. The citation evidence showed modest citation counts, and the cited works used the Petitioner's findings only as background information rather than singling them out as particularly important. Expert letters were largely conclusory and lacked specific examples of how the Petitioner's work had influenced the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-20_01_B2203; source_row=21805 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
labor certification requires an advanced degree professional
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO rejected the Petitioner's implicit-bachelor's-degree argument, finding that the plain language at H.14 allows work experience to substitute for a master's degree without any underlying degree, and that H.8-A's 'Other' selection (rather than 'Bachelor's') confirms no bachelor's-degree minimum.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO rejected the Petitioner's implicit-bachelor's-degree argument, finding that the plain language at H.14 allows work experience to substitute for a master's degree without any underlying degree, and that H.8-A's 'Other' selection (rather than 'Bachelor's') confirms no bachelor's-degree minimum.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-20_02_B5203; source_row=21812 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO accepted EDGE's view that an Indian PGD following a three-year bachelor's can equate to a U.S. bachelor's, but only if the institution was accredited or AICTE-approved. The Petitioner's evaluations made bare assertions about the institution's status without supporting documentation, so equivalency was not established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO accepted EDGE's view that an Indian PGD following a three-year bachelor's can equate to a U.S. bachelor's, but only if the institution was accredited or AICTE-approved. The Petitioner's evaluations made bare assertions about the institution's status without supporting documentation, so equivalency was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-20_01_B5203; source_row=21808 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that passing final examinations alone does not establish that all substantive degree requirements were met or that the university approved the diploma in April 2003. The retrospective letters were not issued in the normal course of university business and do not state that all requirements were completed in April 2003, so the post-baccalaureate clock could not start until 2010 or 2011.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that passing final examinations alone does not establish that all substantive degree requirements were met or that the university approved the diploma in April 2003. The retrospective letters were not issued in the normal course of university business and do not state that all requirements were completed in April 2003, so the post-baccalaureate clock could not start until 2010 or 2011.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-20_01_B5203; source_row=21809 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
qualifying experience documented per 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO declined to consider the new letters because a motion to reconsider is limited to the record at the time of the prior decision, and the original letters did not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to consider the new letters because a motion to reconsider is limited to the record at the time of the prior decision, and the original letters did not satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-20_02_B5203; source_row=21811 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c