Approved Profiles AAO Decisions Source-backed decision research
Explore how AAO evaluates evidence. Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings
Showing 1651–1660
EB-1A EB-1A · Scholarly authorship Established Automated extraction · broader context
Jan 16, 2025 Case facts
Environment / Energy 20 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Scholarly authorship scholarly articles
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director that the scholarly articles criterion was established, noting roughly 20 peer-reviewed publications.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning + AAO agreed with the Director that the scholarly articles criterion was established, noting roughly 20 peer-reviewed publications. Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_01_B2203; source_row=42706
Open source dataset ↗ NIW NIW · Well positioned Reserved Automated extraction · broader context
Jan 16, 2025 Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved prong two as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong one.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning + AAO explicitly reserved prong two as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong one. Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_01_B5203; source_row=42709
Open source dataset ↗ NIW NIW · Waiver on balance Reserved Automated extraction · broader context
Jan 16, 2025 Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO explicitly reserved prong three as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong one.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning + AAO explicitly reserved prong three as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong one. Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_01_B5203; source_row=42710
Open source dataset ↗ NIW NIW · Well positioned Reserved Automated extraction · broader context
Jan 16, 2025 Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
What the decision said
AAO did not reach the second prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning + AAO did not reach the second prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary. Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_03_B5203; source_row=42724
Open source dataset ↗ NIW NIW · Waiver on balance Reserved Automated extraction · broader context
Jan 16, 2025 Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance on balance beneficial to the United States to waive job offer
What the decision said
AAO did not reach the third prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning + AAO did not reach the third prong because the first prong was not met, rendering further analysis unnecessary. Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_03_B5203; source_row=42725
Open source dataset ↗ EB-1A EB-1A · Judging Established Automated extraction · broader context
Jan 16, 2025 Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Judging judging the work of others
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO acknowledged the Director's finding that this criterion was met and did not disturb it.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning + AAO acknowledged the Director's finding that this criterion was met and did not disturb it. Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_02_B2203; source_row=42714
Open source dataset ↗ EB-1A EB-1A · Leading / critical role Reserved Automated extraction · broader context
Jan 16, 2025 Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations
What the decision said
AAO reserved this criterion because, even if met, the Petitioner could not reach the required three criteria.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning + AAO reserved this criterion because, even if met, the Petitioner could not reach the required three criteria. Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_02_B2203; source_row=42716
Open source dataset ↗ EB-1A EB-1A · Published material Established Automated extraction · broader context
Jan 16, 2025 Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material published material
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO affirmed that the Petitioner meets the published material criterion, consistent with the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning + AAO affirmed that the Petitioner meets the published material criterion, consistent with the Director's finding. Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_03_B2203; source_row=42718
Open source dataset ↗ EB-1A EB-1A · Leading / critical role Established Automated extraction · broader context
Jan 16, 2025 Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO affirmed that the Petitioner meets the leading or critical role criterion, consistent with the Director's finding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning + AAO affirmed that the Petitioner meets the leading or critical role criterion, consistent with the Director's finding. Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_03_B2203; source_row=42721
Open source dataset ↗ EB-1A EB-1A · Final merits Reserved Automated extraction · broader context
Jan 16, 2025 Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserves the final merits determination because the Petitioner's failure to meet three criteria is dispositive, citing INS v. Bagamasbad.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning + AAO reserves the final merits determination because the Petitioner's failure to meet three criteria is dispositive, citing INS v. Bagamasbad. Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-01-16_03_B2203; source_row=42722
Open source dataset ↗ ← Previous 166 Next → ← Back to assessment