Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO affirmed that the record supports a finding that the Petitioner meets the display criterion, as his paintings were documented as displayed at named artistic exhibitions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that the record supports a finding that the Petitioner meets the display criterion, as his paintings were documented as displayed at named artistic exhibitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-07_01_B2203; source_row=21768 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
bachelor's degree plus five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the Director's reliance on the diploma issuance date, finding instead that the May 29, 2002 provisional certificate is the earliest official academic record establishing the degree. Even using that earlier date, the Beneficiary still falls 26 days short of five years of qualifying experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's reliance on the diploma issuance date, finding instead that the May 29, 2002 provisional certificate is the earliest official academic record establishing the degree. Even using that earlier date, the Beneficiary still falls 26 days short of five years of qualifying experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-01_01_B5203; source_row=21763 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Overall magnitude of business activities (Sonegawa factors)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the Petitioner's financial trajectory negative across all key metrics from 2013–2015, with no evidence of uncharacteristic expenses to explain the decline. The claim of consulting-fee replacement was unsupported by sufficient documentation. Bank statements were rejected as non-enumerated evidence unable to show sustainable paying ability, and the shareholder's personal funds were legally irrelevant.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner's financial trajectory negative across all key metrics from 2013–2015, with no evidence of uncharacteristic expenses to explain the decline. The claim of consulting-fee replacement was unsupported by sufficient documentation. Bank statements were rejected as non-enumerated evidence unable to show sustainable paying ability, and the shareholder's personal funds were legally irrelevant.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-09-01_02_B5203; source_row=21765 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The expert letters lacked specificity about how the Petitioner's achievements affected the field broadly; the automated tool letters did not show commercial implementation; conference participation alone does not reflect major significance; and the Petitioner's work appeared limited to advancing his employer's initiatives rather than the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The expert letters lacked specificity about how the Petitioner's achievements affected the field broadly; the automated tool letters did not show commercial implementation; conference participation alone does not reflect major significance; and the Petitioner's work appeared limited to advancing his employer's initiatives rather than the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=21758 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The letters did not specify how the Petitioner's role fit into the organizational hierarchy, how his work was critical to the organization's success and standing, or how he differed from the many other clinical trial managers worldwide. The record also did not sufficiently establish the organization's distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters did not specify how the Petitioner's role fit into the organizational hierarchy, how his work was critical to the organization's success and standing, or how he differed from the many other clinical trial managers worldwide. The record also did not sufficiently establish the organization's distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=21761 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that scientific conferences are not the same as artistic showcases or exhibitions, and the Petitioner's work is not artistic in nature, so this criterion is not met.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that scientific conferences are not the same as artistic showcases or exhibitions, and the Petitioner's work is not artistic in nature, so this criterion is not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=21760 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that managerial evaluation duties do not equate to serving as a formal judge of the work of others. The phrase 'a judge' implies a formal designation, not incidental supervisory evaluation of subordinates.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that managerial evaluation duties do not equate to serving as a formal judge of the work of others. The phrase 'a judge' implies a formal designation, not incidental supervisory evaluation of subordinates.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=21757 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO declined to conduct a full Kazarian step-2 analysis since the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria at step 1, but noted in the aggregate that the record does not establish the required level of expertise, sustained national or international acclaim, or extensive documentation of recognition in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full Kazarian step-2 analysis since the Petitioner failed to meet three criteria at step 1, but noted in the aggregate that the record does not establish the required level of expertise, sustained national or international acclaim, or extensive documentation of recognition in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=21762 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c