Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16651–16660
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found in its prior motion decision that the Petitioner's proposed ASD education research has substantial merit and national importance, although her proposed teaching activities did not meet this prong.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found in its prior motion decision that the Petitioner's proposed ASD education research has substantial merit and national importance, although her proposed teaching activities did not meet this prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-22_01_B5203; source_row=21748 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that while the Petitioner's proposed metallurgical engineering work has substantial merit, she failed to demonstrate national importance. The record did not show that her specific work offers original innovations advancing the steel and wire industry or otherwise has broader implications in the field of metallurgical engineering beyond her employer and its customers.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's proposed metallurgical engineering work has substantial merit, she failed to demonstrate national importance. The record did not show that her specific work offers original innovations advancing the steel and wire industry or otherwise has broader implications in the field of metallurgical engineering beyond her employer and its customers. Counsel's assertions about consulting in oil and gas and aerospace were inconsistent with other evidence and lacked sufficient detail.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-21_01_B5203; source_row=21740 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded that the combination of high-level judging invitations, media recognition as a pioneer and expert, top-percentage app installations, involvement in accelerator programs, and affirmation by a business executive who selected the Petitioner after a worldwide screening establishes eligibility.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that the combination of high-level judging invitations, media recognition as a pioneer and expert, top-percentage app installations, involvement in accelerator programs, and affirmation by a business executive who selected the Petitioner after a worldwide screening establishes eligibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=21739 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO faulted the Director for conflating criterion viii with criterion v, noting they require different analyses. AAO found that the Petitioner performs a leading or critical role as cofounder and creator of the company's most utilized app, and that app download figures and media coverage are consistent with a finding that the app development business enjoys a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO faulted the Director for conflating criterion viii with criterion v, noting they require different analyses. AAO found that the Petitioner performs a leading or critical role as cofounder and creator of the company's most utilized app, and that app download figures and media coverage are consistent with a finding that the app development business enjoys a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=21738 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
One article discusses the Petitioner and his brother at length, explaining how they came to work on apps, making it sufficiently 'about' the Petitioner. New appellate exhibits confirmed the publication has a readership of 815,000 and is the second most popular newspaper in Spain by readership and circulation, qualifying it as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
One article discusses the Petitioner and his brother at length, explaining how they came to work on apps, making it sufficiently 'about' the Petitioner. New appellate exhibits confirmed the publication has a readership of 815,000 and is the second most popular newspaper in Spain by readership and circulation, qualifying it as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=21736 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
judging the work of others in the same or allied field
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record supports the Director's determination that the Petitioner judged software and hardware projects at a hackathon, judged an entrepreneurial competition in Spain with 700 participants, and was one of four reviewers of a published guide.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The record supports the Director's determination that the Petitioner judged software and hardware projects at a hackathon, judged an entrepreneurial competition in Spain with 700 participants, and was one of four reviewers of a published guide.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-21_01_B2203; source_row=21737 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Materials ScienceEngineer
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the Petitioner's past experience in metallurgical engineering renders her well positioned to advance her proposed endeavor supporting her employer's production and manufacturing initiatives. Her employer described her as an experienced professional who fulfilled all requisite qualifications, and her graduate research demonstrated development of a novel metallurgy technique.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's past experience in metallurgical engineering renders her well positioned to advance her proposed endeavor supporting her employer's production and manufacturing initiatives. Her employer described her as an experienced professional who fulfilled all requisite qualifications, and her graduate research demonstrated development of a novel metallurgy technique.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-21_01_B5203; source_row=21741 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Materials ScienceEngineer
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
What the decision said
AAO declined to address the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance of her proposed endeavor under prong one, making further analysis of the balancing factors unnecessary.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to address the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance of her proposed endeavor under prong one, making further analysis of the balancing factors unnecessary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-21_01_B5203; source_row=21742 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The submitted articles were about a Spanish immersion program and a school visit by a governor, not about the Petitioner herself. The articles also failed to include required information such as dates and authors, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate the publications were professional, major trade, or major media outlets.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted articles were about a Spanish immersion program and a school visit by a governor, not about the Petitioner herself. The articles also failed to include required information such as dates and authors, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate the publications were professional, major trade, or major media outlets.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-08-18_01_B2203; source_row=21723 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c