Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16811–16820
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO explicitly declined to reach a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to reach a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-12_02_B2203; source_row=21575 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the aggregate record does not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-12_01_B2203; source_row=21568 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the Petitioner demonstrated she meets the artistic display criterion because she performed at various exhibitions, including performances in Canada, as part of her dance company.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Petitioner demonstrated she meets the artistic display criterion because she performed at various exhibitions, including performances in Canada, as part of her dance company.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-12_01_B2203; source_row=21567 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The articles submitted on appeal actually undercut the publication's claims of popularity, with one article noting the paper is not a big seller and vendors confirming they sell very few copies, so the Petitioner did not establish the publication qualifies as a major medium.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The articles submitted on appeal actually undercut the publication's claims of popularity, with one article noting the paper is not a big seller and vendors confirming they sell very few copies, so the Petitioner did not establish the publication qualifies as a major medium.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-12_01_B2203; source_row=21565 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record reflects that the Petitioner displayed her work on stage at concerts and theaters and appeared as an actress in a short film featured at a film festival, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record reflects that the Petitioner displayed her work on stage at concerts and theaters and appeared as an actress in a short film featured at a film festival, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-12_03_B2203; source_row=21580 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters and internal memoranda showed the Petitioner's promotional contributions within her bank but did not establish that her work significantly influenced the broader banking field. Letters attesting to her status without specific examples of field-wide impact are insufficient.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters and internal memoranda showed the Petitioner's promotional contributions within her bank but did not establish that her work significantly influenced the broader banking field. Letters attesting to her status without specific examples of field-wide impact are insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-11_02_B2203; source_row=21561 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The academic institution was one where the Petitioner was a student, not a member. The performing rights organization does not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The jazz club was an employer, not an association, and also did not meet the requirements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The academic institution was one where the Petitioner was a student, not a member. The performing rights organization does not require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts. The jazz club was an employer, not an association, and also did not meet the requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=21555 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The Petitioner did not provide evidence of her cumulative annual wages to compare against available data. She also failed to show how her per-class rate represented significantly high remuneration compared to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not provide evidence of her cumulative annual wages to compare against available data. She also failed to show how her per-class rate represented significantly high remuneration compared to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=21559 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Recommendation letters were primarily conclusory and did not explain how the Petitioner's contributions impacted the field beyond personal experiences. One letter referenced only future potential contributions. The Petitioner did not demonstrate how her recordings, concerts, or performances influenced the field in a significant manner.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Recommendation letters were primarily conclusory and did not explain how the Petitioner's contributions impacted the field beyond personal experiences. One letter referenced only future potential contributions. The Petitioner did not demonstrate how her recordings, concerts, or performances influenced the field in a significant manner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-11_01_B2203; source_row=21556 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organization
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's capacity as vice president and vice governor, in which she created several promotional campaigns implemented across branches including a registered trademark, established a critical role for a distinguished organization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's capacity as vice president and vice governor, in which she created several promotional campaigns implemented across branches including a registered trademark, established a critical role for a distinguished organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-07-11_02_B2203; source_row=21562 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c