Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 16871–16880
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding the petitioner failed to provide documentation supporting the earnings claims or sufficient comparative data about remuneration of others in the field, and that comparing to average Russian wages generally does not satisfy the criterion's requirement of comparison against others in the petitioner's field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding, concluding the petitioner failed to provide documentation supporting the earnings claims or sufficient comparative data about remuneration of others in the field, and that comparing to average Russian wages generally does not satisfy the criterion's requirement of comparison against others in the petitioner's field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B2203; source_row=21501 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO credited the wages paid to the Beneficiary ($63,574.94 in 2014) and found that only the gap of $44,294.06 needed to be covered. While the 2014 tax returns showed a net loss and net current liabilities, AAO applied the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis and found that the Petitioner's long history of operation, growing gross receipts, CPA confirmation of an uncharacteristic 2014 downturn, and outstanding industr…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO credited the wages paid to the Beneficiary ($63,574.94 in 2014) and found that only the gap of $44,294.06 needed to be covered. While the 2014 tax returns showed a net loss and net current liabilities, AAO applied the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances analysis and found that the Petitioner's long history of operation, growing gross receipts, CPA confirmation of an uncharacteristic 2014 downturn, and outstanding industry reputation established ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B5203; source_row=21503 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's 2015 federal income tax returns reflected sufficient net income to cover the gap between the proffered wage and wages paid ($43,881.24 difference), establishing ability to pay for 2015.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's 2015 federal income tax returns reflected sufficient net income to cover the gap between the proffered wage and wages paid ($43,881.24 difference), establishing ability to pay for 2015.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B5203; source_row=21504 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Five years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
Of the four employer letters in the record, one failed to describe duties or verify full-time employment; one was sufficient (385 days of qualifying experience); one had conflicting dates and lacked full-time verification; and one covered employment not listed on the labor certification and included pre-baccalaureate periods. Collectively, the letters did not document five years of qualifying experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Of the four employer letters in the record, one failed to describe duties or verify full-time employment; one was sufficient (385 days of qualifying experience); one had conflicting dates and lacked full-time verification; and one covered employment not listed on the labor certification and included pre-baccalaureate periods. Collectively, the letters did not document five years of qualifying experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B5203; source_row=21505 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the review of the petitioner's debut album in a Russian music magazine qualified as published material in major media, noting that other articles in the record described the publication as a popular magazine, meeting the preponderance standard.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the review of the petitioner's debut album in a Russian music magazine qualified as published material in major media, noting that other articles in the record described the publication as a popular magazine, meeting the preponderance standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-20_01_B2203; source_row=21498 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner must show his work was on display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, but he failed to establish that the competitions or programs constituted artistic venues displaying his work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner must show his work was on display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, but he failed to establish that the competitions or programs constituted artistic venues displaying his work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=21495 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Although the Petitioner demonstrated a leading role with one organization, a certificate showing 'good standings' was insufficient to establish a distinguished reputation. As to the second organization, his committee chairperson role did not establish a leading or critical role, and evidence that it was the governing sports body in Nepal did not demonstrate a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner demonstrated a leading role with one organization, a certificate showing 'good standings' was insufficient to establish a distinguished reputation. As to the second organization, his committee chairperson role did not establish a leading or critical role, and evidence that it was the governing sports body in Nepal did not demonstrate a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=21496 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner's roles and positions are not determinative; he must show that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. The letters provided did not establish that membership conditions met the plain language of the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner's roles and positions are not determinative; he must show that membership requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts. The letters provided did not establish that membership conditions met the plain language of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=21492 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c