Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Although the Petitioner provided background on the publication and reasons for selection, the evidence did not show the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the Petitioner provided background on the publication and reasons for selection, the evidence did not show the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=21491 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record shows the Petitioner received a 'Best Referee and Judge Award' for his work at an event, indicating his role included judging. AAO disagreed with the Director and found this criterion met.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The record shows the Petitioner received a 'Best Referee and Judge Award' for his work at an event, indicating his role included judging. AAO disagreed with the Director and found this criterion met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=21494 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why the evidence was persuasive
The record contains an article discussing the Petitioner as a martial arts instructor in a publication shown to be a major medium in India, satisfying this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contains an article discussing the Petitioner as a martial arts instructor in a publication shown to be a major medium in India, satisfying this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-19_01_B2203; source_row=21493 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Although a colleague's letter asserted the Petitioner judged fellow journalists' work in his capacity as assistant editor, the letter lacked specific information about the journalists whose work was judged and the articles reviewed. No documentary evidence of actual review or edits was provided.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
Although a colleague's letter asserted the Petitioner judged fellow journalists' work in his capacity as assistant editor, the letter lacked specific information about the journalists whose work was judged and the articles reviewed. No documentary evidence of actual review or edits was provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-16_01_B2203; source_row=21484 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Chevening Scholarship eligibility criteria do not reflect that it is a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in journalism. Uncorroborated colleague statements were insufficient, and one letter contained an inaccuracy about eligibility requirements.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Chevening Scholarship eligibility criteria do not reflect that it is a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in journalism. Uncorroborated colleague statements were insufficient, and one letter contained an inaccuracy about eligibility requirements. The additional appeal evidence showed Chevening is awarded for academic and leadership potential, not for excellence in journalism specifically.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-16_01_B2203; source_row=21482 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
The submitted articles are not about the Petitioner but about his news organization's coverage, and the record lacks sufficient evidence that the outlets qualify as major media. A technology blog lacked author identification and evidence of major media status. A promotional billboard does not constitute published material with a title, date, and author as required.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted articles are not about the Petitioner but about his news organization's coverage, and the record lacks sufficient evidence that the outlets qualify as major media. A technology blog lacked author identification and evidence of major media status. A promotional billboard does not constitute published material with a title, date, and author as required.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-16_01_B2203; source_row=21483 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
For fields outside academia, a scholarly article must be written for learned persons — those with profound knowledge of a field. The Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence that his news stories were written for learned journalists or otherwise constitute scholarly articles in the field of journalism.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
For fields outside academia, a scholarly article must be written for learned persons — those with profound knowledge of a field. The Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence that his news stories were written for learned journalists or otherwise constitute scholarly articles in the field of journalism.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-16_01_B2203; source_row=21486 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters primarily contain discussions and attestations without specific examples of how the contributions rise to major significance. The iPhone broadcast technique lacked evidence of field-wide impact. The multimedia show lacked ratings or viewership data. Citations in a book and Congressional report were used as background information, not as works of major significance.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The letters primarily contain discussions and attestations without specific examples of how the contributions rise to major significance. The iPhone broadcast technique lacked evidence of field-wide impact. The multimedia show lacked ratings or viewership data. Citations in a book and Congressional report were used as background information, not as works of major significance. Translation work and interviews of officials were not shown to constitute original contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-16_01_B2203; source_row=21485 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the Director's finding that the record supports the Petitioner meeting this criterion as a critical role performer for a news organization with a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director's finding that the record supports the Petitioner meeting this criterion as a critical role performer for a news organization with a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-16_01_B2203; source_row=21487 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Minimum educational requirement per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the plain language of the labor certification instructions requires listing a major field of study in reference to the minimum education level, and the phrase 'or any related field' logically modifies the fields immediately preceding it (computer science, engineering).…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the plain language of the labor certification instructions requires listing a major field of study in reference to the minimum education level, and the phrase 'or any related field' logically modifies the fields immediately preceding it (computer science, engineering). The Petitioner's alternative reading was not supported by the labor certification language, and DOL's certification does not determine whether the alien is qualified for the job.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2017-06-16_01_B5203; source_row=21489 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c